壹、中文部分
王文科(1994)。台灣地區國民中小學特殊教育發展指標之研究(1)--啟智教育部份。教育部社會教育司補助專案研究。
王雪峰（2004）。美國教師教育面臨多元文化的挑戰。中外教育新知，2，46-54。
王登安（2001）。多元文化教育的省思。南投文教，15，60-65。
王美音譯（Bill Gates 等人著）(1996)。擁抱未來（初版）。台北：遠流。
吳秉恩(1986)。組織行為學。台北：華泰。
吳明清(1995)。教育方案評鑑模式及其應用。教育資料與研究，4，44-48。
吳清山(1989)。國民小學管理模式與學校效能關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。
吳清山(1991)。學校行政。台北：心理。
吳清山（1992）。學校效能研究。台北：五南。
吳清山（1992）。教育革新與發展。台北：師大書苑。
吳清山(1998)。學校效能研究。台北：五南。
吳清山（2001）。教育行政人員專業倫理內涵建構之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成告。
吳清山(2001)。教育發展研究。台北：元照。
吳清山、林天祐(2005)。教育新辭書，p.180-181，臺北市: 高等教育。
吳培源(1994)。台灣省高級中學校長領導型態、學校氣氛與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立台灣師範大學、台北。
向天屏（2006）。女性主義教育學的理論基礎及其對教學的啟示。中等教育，56（1），68-85。
江志正（2000）。國民小學團體動力、組織學習、學校發展策略與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學、高雄。
吳百祿（2004）。學校領導－願景、領導與管理。高雄：復文。
吳榕峰（2012）。把學生學習擺第一。2012/09/04 （聯合報╱記者陳秋雲／豐原報導）。
吳宗立（1998）。國民中學組織衝突、外在壓力、行政決策與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學、台北。
吳清基（1989）。教育與行政。台北：師大書苑。
吳雅玲（2000）。女性主義教育學及其對教育之啟示。教育研究，8，227-238。
吳璧如（1998）。教育歷程中家長參與學校教育之研究。國教學報，10，1-13。
林水波（2006）。領導新論。台北：五南。
李茂能（2006）。結構方程模式軟體 Amos 之簡介及其在測驗編製上之應用。台北：心理。
李曉蓉（1999）。激進女性主義與教育。教育研究，7，191-201。
卓秀冬（1995）。台灣省高級中等學校組織文化與學校效能之關係(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學、台北。
林火旺（2001）。倫理學。台北：五南。
林金福（2002）。高中職校長轉型領導、知識管理與學校效能之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學、台北。
林明地（2002）。校長學－工作分析與角色研究取向。台北：五南。
林明地（2004）。學校領導：理念與校長專業生涯。台北：高等教育。
林明地譯、Deal,T.E. & Peterson,K.D.著（1998）。學校領導－平衡邏輯與藝術。台北：五南。
林明地、楊振昇、江芳盛譯、Owens,R.G.著（2000）。教育組織行為。台北：楊智文化。
林明地、王如哲、王瑞壎等譯、Hoy,W.K. & Miskel,C.G 著（2003）。教育行政學－理論、研究與實際。高雄：麗
文。
林思伶（2004）。析論僕人式/服務領導（Servant-Leadership）的概念發展與研究。高雄師大學報，16，39-57。
林逸青（2003）。國中校長權力運作策略、衝突管理策略與學校效能之關係：微觀政治分析(未出版之博士論文)。國立台北師範學院、台北。
林瓊惠（2004）。探討多元文化課程與族群教育之關係。國教新知，51（1），85-95。
周守民（1997）。新世紀的管理－談僕性領導。護理雜誌，46（2），72-76。
周武昌（2004）。後現代主義及其對學校管理的啟示。研習資訊，21（2），88-95。
邱皓政（2000）。量化研究與統計分析。台北：五南。
邱皓政（2003）。結構方程模式－LISREL 的理論、技術與應用。台北：雙葉。
邱勝濱（2009）。高中職校長領導特質、領導行為與領導效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學、彰化。
范熾文（2002）。國小校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校組織績效之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立台灣師範大學、台北。
香港教育專業守則（1990）。http:www2.hkedcity.
net/citizen_files/aa/dw/pc1994/public_html/text/Chinese/code02.htm
侯世昌（2002）。國民小學家長教育期望、參與學校教育與學校效能之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立台灣師範大學、台北。
侯世昌（2008）。國民小學校長轉型領導之研究。
研習資訊，25（5），95-100。
柯進雄（2000）。學校行政領導。台北：商鼎。
施信華（2009）。高級職業學校行政人員協力領導與學校效能之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學、彰化。
馬向青（1999）。後現代主義知識論及其在教育上的蘊義。教育研究，7，355-367。
徐易男（2004）。女性主義的哲理及其對學校教育的啟示。專業走廊，43（4），63-65。
秦夢群（1997）。教育行政－理論部分。台北：五南。
秦夢群（1997）。教育行政－實務部分。台北：五南。
殷文、蔡慧菁譯(2006)。Covey,S.R.著。第 8 個習慣—從成功到卓越。台北：天下。
莊明貞（2002）。後現代思潮的課程研究及其本土實踐之評析。教育研究月刊，120，27-39。
郭維哲（2002）。兩性平等教育理論的探究。人文及社會學
科教學通訊，13（1），77-83。
許芳懿（2001）。後現代思潮與教育。國立台南師範學院等教育學報，14，343-366。
梁滄郎、邱勝濱、劉琮閔(2001)。高級職業學校校長領導行為與領導效能相關之研究。工業教育學刊，25，37-46。
張竺雲（1986）。組織社會學。台北：三民。
張沛文譯（2001）。Hunter,J.C.著。僕人－修道院的領導啟示錄。台北：商周。
張金鑑（1985）。管理學新論。台北：五南。
張明輝（1999）。九十年代中小學學校教育革新之策略與展望。教育研究集刊，43，103-137。
張明輝（1999）。學校教育與行政革新研究。台北：師大書苑。
張明輝（2002）。學校經營與管理研究。台北：學富。
張明輝（日期不詳）。英國學校效能與學校革新研究。2001 年9 月27 日，取自：
http://web.cc.ntnu.edu.tw/~minfei/engishschooleffectiveness.htm。
張清濱(1991)。學校效能與教育評鑑。師友，291，34-37。
張瑞村（1997）。高級工業職業學校校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學、台北。
張德銳（1995）。教育行政研究。台北：五南。
張慶勳（1996）。國小校長轉化、互異領導影響學校組織文化特性與組織效能之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學、高雄。
張慶勳（1996）。學校組織行為。台北：五南。
張慶勳（1997）。學校轉化領導研究。高雄：復文。
連俊智、林明地（2013）。教育領導的學習共同體－學校領導動力剖析(The Learning Community of Educational Leadership: An Analysis of School Leadership Dynamics)，學校行政，85，P137–155。
黃一峰(2010)。高階文官協力領導能力探討。人事月刊，50:3:37-44。
黃一峰 (2010)。評鑑中心法應用於高階文官培訓之探討。171: 63-69。
黃昆輝（2002）。教育行政學。台北：東華。
黃政傑（1993）。國際有效能學校管理與教學合作之研究。台北：國立台灣師範大學教育研究中心專題研究成果報告。
黃政傑(1996)。中小學基本學力指標之綜合規劃研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究中心專題研究成果報告0113 號。
黃政傑(1997)。國民小學效能縱貫研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究中心專題研究成果報告0129 號。
黃振球（1992）。績優學校。台北：師大書苑。
黃振球(1996)。學校管理與績效。台北：師大書苑。
黃楸萍（2003）。後現代教育思潮及超越。國教新知，50（1），128-136。
楊智穎（2002）。當前國內多元文化課程的反省與展望。人文及社會學科教學通訊，12（6），134-143。
葉子超（2004）。地方勢力介入學校事務、校長因應策略與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學、高雄。
葉連祺（2004）。鳥瞰教育領導理念之叢林－教育領導理念之初步綜觀。教育研究月刊，124，96-108。
廖春文（1996）。後現代教育的困境與超越。台中師院學報，10，1-42。
傅振焜譯(P. F. Drucker 著)(1994)。後資本主義社會。台北：時報文化。
劉瑞杰(2007)。The Common Results of the Eastern and
Western Leadership Theory and Mutual Absorbency in
the Modern Development，Journal of US-China
Public Administration，4（4），P16–17。
陳木金(2004)。趨勢領導理論對學校行政經營的啟示。刊載於 2004.12.25 學校行政論壇第十三次學術研討會會議手冊(p.107-120)。
陳成宏（2005）。學校變革與校長領導理論的整合性觀點：Bolman 和 Deal 之多元架構領導途徑分析。教育研究與發展期刊，1（2），155-176。
陳啟東（2004）。高級職業學校校長領導型態對教師組織公民行為與學校組織績效影響之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學、彰化。
陳怡君(2007)。我國高級中學行政人員協力領導與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立嘉義大學、嘉義。
陳嘉惠（2001）。國小教師轉化、互易領導與學生文化關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院、屏東。
賴清標（2011）。中市前教育局長賴清標：特色招生應降比率。取自http://udn.com/NEWS/DOMESTIC/DOM4/6642187.shtml#ixzz1aKhaSpKkPower By udn.com（聯合報╱記者喻文玟／台中報導）2011.10.10 03:32 am
蔡素琴(1997)。學校組織結構與學校效能之理論分析。教育研究，5，203-220。
蔡培林 (1993)。國民中學學校管理型態與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學、台北。
蔡進雄（2000）。國民中學校長轉型領導、互易領導、學校文化與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立台灣師範大學、台北。
蔡進雄（2001）。學校教育與行政。台北：商鼎。
蔡進雄（2004）。論教師領導的趨勢與發展。教育資料與研究，59，92-98。
蔡進雄（2004）。學校轉型領導的理論與實際。教育研究月刊，119，53-65。
蕭錫錡(2010)。學校領導理論與實務。台北市：高等教育。
鍾任琴、曾騰光、張瑞村（2003）。學校效能整合性分析。台中：朝陽科技大學師資培育中心。
鍾瑞國(2010)。技職校院綠色產業管理。在美國西北理工大學發表研究論文 (中央社訊息服務20101125 )。全球教育論壇(Global Education Consortium)與美國西北理工大學(Northwestern Polytechnic University, NPU)主辦。並由台灣修平技術學院共同承辦之「21世紀全球綠色教育暨組織領導國際研討會」。
鄭友超（1993）。我國工業類科職業學校學校效能之探討。台中：正工。
鄭友超（1993）。我國工業類科職業學校學校效能基本理論之探討。工業職業教育雙月刊，11（2），9-14。
鄭友超（1999）。我國高職（中）工業類科學校學校效能之研究。台北：行政院國家科學委員會。NSC88-2516-S-018-002。
鄭友超（2002）。我國高級職業學校管理模式與學校效能相關之研究。台北：行政院國家科學委員會。NSC90-2516-S-018-009。
鄭友超、姚威旭（1997）。我國高職（中）工業類科學校組織文化、組織特質、教師工作態度與學校效能關係之研究。台北：行政院國家科學委員會。
鄭彩鳳（1995）。競值途徑應用在高中職校長領導角色、學校組織文化與組織效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學、高雄。
鄭燕祥（1995）。教育的功能與效能（修訂第三版）。香港：廣角鏡。
鄭燕祥（2001）。學校效能及校本管理發展的機制。台北：心理。
鄭燕祥（2006）。教育範式轉變：效能保證。台北：高等教育。
劉春榮（1993）。國民小學組織結構、組織承諾與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學、台北。
潘慧玲（1999a）。教育學發展的女性主義觀點：女性主義教育學初探。載於國立台灣師範大學教育學系教育部國家講座主編，教育科學的國際化與本土化（頁 527-552）。台北：楊智。
潘慧玲（1999b）。學校效能研究領域的發展。教育研究集刊，43，77-102。
潘慧玲（1999c）。學校效能相關概念的釐析。教育研究資訊，7（5），138-153。
潘慧玲（2005）。邁向下一代的教育評鑑：回顧與前瞻。載於潘慧玲（主編），教育評鑑的回顧與展望（頁1-36）。台北市：心理。
潘慧玲（2006）。彰權益能評鑑之探析。當代教育研究，14（1），1-24。
謝小芩(1988)。好學校的必備條件。教育資料文摘，126，4-13。
謝文全（1998）。道德領導－學校行政領導的另一扇窗。輯於林玉體（主編），跨世紀的教育演變。台北：文景。
謝文全（2006）。教育行政學。台北：高等教育。
謝金青（1997）。國民小學學校效能評鑑指標與權重體系之建構(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學、台北。
簡成熙（2003）。女性主義的知識論與科學哲學初探。教育研究月刊，109，25-38。



貳、外文部分
Algert,N.E.(1998).Peer conflict: Similarities and differences among three adolescent groups.(Doctoraldissertation, Texas A & M niversity).DissertationAbstracts International, 59(4356).
Alvesson, M. (1987). Organizations, culture, and ideology. International Studies ofManagement andOrganizations, 17(3), 4-18.
Bass, B.M., & Avolio, B.J. (1990). Transformational leadership development: Manualfor the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Palo Alto: Consulting PsychologistsPress.
Bass, Bernard M.,& Riggio, Ronald E.(2006). Transformational Leadership. (2nd ed.),Mahwah, N.J. : L. Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Bamberg, W. (2004). An application of the synergistic leadership theory to theleadership experiences of five female superintendents leading successful school districts. Dissertation of the Sam Houston State University.
Barnard, C.I. (1971). The functions of the executive. Mass: Harvard University Press.
Bass, B.M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectation. New York: FreePress.
Bass,B.M.(1997).Does the transactional-transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries? American Psychologist, 52(2),130-139.
Bass, B.M., & Avolio, B.J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness throughtransformational leadership. CA: Sage.
Bennis, W. (1994). The four competencies of leadership. Training and DevelopmentJournal, 38(8), 14-19.
Bennis, W., & Nanus, B. (1997). Leaders: Strategies for taking charge(2nd ed.). NewYork: Harper Collins Publishers.
Bjork, L.G. (2001). Institutional barriers to educational reform: A superintendents’ rolein district decentralization. In. Brunner, C.C., & Bjork, L.G. (Eds.), Advances inresearch and theories in school management and educational policy : The newsuperintendency, 6, 205-238. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd.
Blake, R.R., & Mouton, J.S. (1964). The managerial grid.Houston, TX: Gulf.
Blumberg, A., & Greenfield, W. (1986). The effective principal: Perspectives onschool leadership. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. (ED283274)
Bolman, G.L., & Deal, E.T. (1997). Reframing organizations: Artistry,choice,andleadership.(2rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bolman, L.G., & Deal, T.E. (2003). Reframing organizations: Artistry,choice,andleadership (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers.
Borg, W.R., & Gall, M.D. (1996). Educational research: An introduction. N.Y.: Longman.
Bossert et al. (1982). The instructional management: Role of the principal.Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(3), 1-11.
Brookover, W.B., & Lezotte, L.W.(1979). Changes in school characteristicscoincident with changes in student achievement. East Lasing: Michigan StateUniversity, College of Urban Development.
Brown, G., & Irby, B.J. (1995). The development of a feminist-inclusive leadershiptheory, In Bredeson, P. & Scribner, J. (Eds.). The professoriate: Challenge andpromises.Technomic, Lancaster, PA.
Brunner, C.C. (1995). By power defined: Women and the superintendency.Educational Considerations, 22(20), 21-26.
Brunner, C., & Duncan, P.(1998). Constructed collaborative leaders: In the companyof women administrators. In Brown, G. & Irby, B. (Eds.), Women leaders:Structuring success, 50-64. Dubuque, IA: Kendall-Hunt Publishing.
Bryman, A. (1992). Charisma and leadership in organizations. London: Sage Publications.
Bryman, A. (1996). Leadership in organizations. In Clegg, S.R., Hardy, C., & Nord,W.R. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Burns, J.M. (1978).Leadership.New York: Harper & Row Publishers.
Caldwell, B., & Hayward, D.K. (1998). The future of schools. Lewes, U.K.: Falmer Press.
Cammann, C. et al. (1983). Assessing the attitudes and perceptions of organizationalmembers. In S.E. Seashore et al. (Eds.), Assessing organization change (pp.71-138). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Candice Scott, M.A. (2003). Organizational effectiveness: Its relationship to teacher efficacy and school climate. Dissertation of the St. John’s University.
Cannella,S.(1998).Criticalresearch:Postmodern methodologies for the examination of ethnicity, class,and gender in deucation, in Advancing Women,availableat: www.advancingwomen.com/
awl/winter98/awlv2_1pix.html
Cannella, S. (1998). Critical research: Postmodern methodologies for the examinationof ethnicity, class, and gender in education, In Advancing Women, available at: www.advancingwomen.com/awl
/winter98/awlv2_lpix.html.
Chance, E.W., & Grady, M.L. (1994). Visionary leadership: Weaving the web andmastering the labyrinth. Las Vegas, NV: Authors.
Chemers, M.M. (1997). An integrative theory of leadership. Mahwah,NJ: Erlbaum.
Cheng, Y.C. (1993). Profiles of organizational culture and effective schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research,Policy, and Practice,4(2), 1-26.
Cheng, Y.C. (1996). School effectiveness and school-based management: A mechanism for development. Washington, DC: The Falmer Press.
Cheng, Y. C. (1996). The pursuit of school effectiveness. H K: Hong Kong Institute ofEducational Research.
Cheng, Y.C. (2001). New theory of school effectiveness assurance in the third wave. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the International Conference on“Knowledge Economy and Education Development”, Taipei, Taiwan.
Cheng, Y.C. (2002). Multi-models of education quality and principal leadership. InK.H. Mok & D. Chan(Eds.), Globalization and education: The quest for qualityeducation in Hong Kong(pp.69-88). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Cheng, Y.C., & Townsend, T. (2000). Educational change and development in theAsia-Pacific region : Trends and issues. In T. Townsend & Y.C. Cheng(Eds.),Educational change and development in the Asia-Pacific region: Challenges forthe future(pp.317-344). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Cherry, K. ( 2013). Leadership Theories: The 8 Major Leadership Theories. Retrievedfrom http://psychology.about.com/od/leadership/p/leadtheories.htm.
Ciulla, J.B. (1998). Ethics, the heart of leadership. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
Coleman, J.S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
Coleman, J.S. et al. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, D.C.:Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
Collins, J.C., & Porras, J.I. (1994). Built to last: Successful habits of visionarycompanies. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
Conger,J.A.(1999).Charismatic and transformational
leadership in organizations: Aninsider’s perspective on these developing streams of research.LeadershipQuarterly, 10(2), 145-179.
Conger, J.A., & Kanungo, R.N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theoryand practice. Academy of Management Journal, 13, 471-482.
Conger, J.A., Kanungo, R.N., & Associates (1988). Charismatic leadership. SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass.
Conley, S.C. (1990). A metaphor for teaching : Beyond the bureaucratic-professionaldichotomy. In Bacharach, S.B. (Ed.), Educational reform:Making sense of itall(pp.313-324). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Cordianni, A. V., & Wilbur, G. (1987). More effective schooling from research to practice.New York: Clearinghouse on Urban Education.
Coombs, P. H. (1969). The world educational crisis: A system analysis. New York: Oxforduniversity press.
Covey, S. (1990). The 7 habits of highly effective people. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Covey, S. (1992). Principle-centered leadership. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Creech II, F.U. (2005). Assessing the efficacy of perceived principal leadership frames and teacher satisfaction. Dissertation of the University of North Carolina.
Creemers, B.P.M. (2001). Educational effectiveness research in an internationalperspective. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the International Conference on “Knowledge Economy and Education Development”, Taipei,Taiwan.
Creemers, B. P. M. (1996). The goals of school effectiveness and school improvement. In D.Reynolds, R. Bollen, P. M. Creemers, D. Hopkins, L. Stoll, & N. Lagerweij (Eds.),Making good school: Linking school effectiveness and school improvement, 21-35. NewYork: Routledge.
Creemers, B.P.M., & Scheerens, J. (1989). Developments in school effectivenessresearch. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(7), 685-825.
Creemers , B.P.M. et al. (1998). The future of school effectiveness and improvement.School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 125-134.
Creighton, T. (1999). Spirituality and the principalship: Leadership for the newmillennium. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning ,3(2).Retrieved July 28, 2005, from http: //www.ucalgary.ca/~iejll
Cummings, T.G., & Molloy, E.S. (1977). Improving productivity and the quality ofwork life. New York: Praeger Publishers.
Daft, R.L., & Lengel, R.H. (2000). Fusion leadership. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Dandridge, T.C., Mitroff, L., & Joyce, W.F. (1980). Organizational symbolism: A topic to expand organizational analysis. Academy of Management Review, 5(1), 77-82.
Daresh, J. (2001, August). Building leaders for the future: The Socorro Independent School District assistant principals academy. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council of Professors of Educational Administration ,Houston, TX.
Davis, G. A., & Thomas, M. A. (1989). Effective schools and effective teachers. Boston: Allynand Bacon.
Deal, T.E., & Peterson, K.D. (1990). The principal’s role in school culture.Washington, D.C.: Office of Educational Research Improvement.
Deth, J.W., & Scarbrough, E. (1995). The impact of values. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dodson, C.K (2005). The relationship between school effectiveness and teachers’ job satisfaction in North Mississippi schools. Dissertation of the University of Mississippi-Oxford.
Donaldson, L. (1999). Performance-driven organizational change: The organizational portfolio. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Drury, D.W. (1999). Reinventing school-based management: A school board guide to school-based improvement. Alexandria, VA: National School Board Association.
Duignan, P. (1986). Research on effective schooling: Some implications for school improvement. The Journal of Education Administration, 24(1), 61.
Duncan, D.M .(1997). Success in workplace: Is your organization’s structure working? Business First of Louisville. Retrieved July 15, 2005 ,from http: //louisille .becentral.com
Edmond, R.R. (1979). Effective school for the urban poor.Educational Leadership,37, 15-27.
Elmore, R.F., Penelope, I.P., & Sarah, J.M.(1996). Restructuring in the classroom:Teaching,learning, and school organization. San Franciso: Jossey-Bass.
Elsbree, W.S., McNally, H.J.,& Wynn, R. (1967). Elementary school administrationand supervision. New York: American Book Company.
Endeman, J.L. (1990). Visionary superintendents and their districts. In M. Sashkin &H.J. Walberg(Eds.), Educational leadership and school culture(pp.146-173).Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing.
English, F. (1999). Marching into the new millennium: The fields of educationaladministration, a paper presented to the National Council of Professors ofEducational Administration, Jackson Hole, WY, August.
Enomoto, E.K. (1997). Negotiating the ethics of care and justice. EducationalAdministration Quarterly, 33(3), 351-370.
Fayol, H. (1949). General and industrial management.London: Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons.
Frederick, J. M. (1987). Measuring school effectiveness: Guidelines for educationalpractitioners. N. J.: Educational Teseing Service.
Fiedler, F.E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Fitz-Gibbon, C. T. (1994). Indicator systems for school and teacher evaluation: Fire-fightingit is ! Paper presented at the Annual National Evaluation Institute of the Center forResearch on Educational Accountability and Teacher Evaluation (3rd, Gatlinburg, TN,July 10-15, 1994). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED379340).
French, J.R.P., & Raven, B.H. (1959).The bases of social power. In Cartwright, D.(Ed.), Studies in social power.Ann Arbor,Mich.: Institue for Social Research.
Gardner,W.L.,&Avolio,B.J.(1998).Thecharismatic relationship : A dramaturgicalperspective. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 32-58.
Gasper, J.M. (1993). Transformational leadership: An integrative review of theliterature. Dissertation Abstracts International ,53, 08A, 2619.
Goodman, R., Fulbright, L., & Zimmerman, W.G. (1997). Getting there from here.Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.
Gossetti, P., & Rusch, E. (1995). Reexamining educational leadership, In Dunlap, D.,& Schmuck, P. (Eds.), Women leading in education, State University of NewYork, Albany, NY.
Grady, M.L., & LeSourd, S.J. (1990). Principals’ attitudes toward leadership. TheHigh School Journal, 73(2), 103-110.
Gray, J. et al. (1990). Estimating difference in the examination performace ofsecondary schools in six LEADS: A multi-level approach to school effectiveness.Oxford Review of Education, 16(2), 137-158.
Green, W.J. (1995). Transformational leadership as a predictor of effectiveness,extraeffort, and satisfaction in higher education. Dissertation Abstracts International,55, 08A, 2466.
Greenleaf, R.K. (1970). The servant as leader. Indianapolis, IN: R.K.GreenleafCenter for Servant Leadership.
Greenleaf, R.K. (1977). Servant leadership. New York: Paulist Press.
Greenleaf, R.K. (1995). Life’s choices and markers. In L.C.Spears(Ed.), Relfectionson leadership: How Robert K. Greenleaf’s theory of servant-leadershipinfluenced today’s top management thinkers(pp.17-21). New York:John Wiley &Sons.
Greenleaf, R.K., & Spears, L.C. (1998). Power of servant leadership. New York:Berrett-Koehler.
Grogan, M.(1996). Voices of women aspiring to the superintendency. Eugene, OR:Eric Clearinghouse on Educational Management. (ERIC DocumentReproduction Service No.ED399658)
Grogan, M. (1999). Equity/equality issues of gender,race, and class. EducationalAdministration Quarterly, 35(4), 518-536.
Guzzetti, B.J. (1983). Report on instruments for measuring school effectiveness.（ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED253573）.
Hage, J., & Aiken, M. (1967). Program change and organizational properties: A comparative analysis. American Journal of Sociology ,72, 503-519.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R.H. (1996). Reassessing the principal’s role in schooleffectiveness: A review of empirical research,1980-1995. EducationalAdministration Quarterly, 32(1), 5-44.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R.H. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to schooleffectiveness:1980-1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2),157-191.
Halpin, A.W. (1966). Theory and research in administration. New York: Macmillan.
Halpin, A.W., & Croft, D.B. (1963). The organizational climate of schools. Chicago :Midwest Administration Center University of Chicago.
Hartsock, N. (1987). Foucault on power: A theory for women? In Nicholson, L.(Ed.),Feminism/postmodernis.( p157-175). Routledge Press, London.
Harvighurst, R.J. et al. (1962). Growing up in River City.New York: John Wiley. Heckman, P.E. (1993). School restructuring inpractice: Reckoning with the culture ofthe school. International Journal of Educational Reform, 2(3), 263-271.
Hemphill, J.K. (1949). Situational factors in leadership. Columbus: Ohio StateUniversity Press.
Hernandez, R.M. (2004). An analysis of superintendents and schoolBoards’ perceptions of the factors of the synergistic leadership theory. Dissertation of the Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX.
Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K.H. (1982). Management of organizational behavior:Utilizing human source.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hodgkinson, C. (1991). Educational leadership: The moral art. New York: StateUniversity of New York Press.
Holmes, M., & Wynne, A. (1989). Making the school an effective community: Belief,practice and theory in school administration. New York: The Falmer Press.
Holtkamp, L.W. (2001). The validation of the organizational and leadershipeffectiveness inventory. (Dissertation of the Sam Houston State University,2001). Dissertation Abstracts International, 62(2300).
Holtz, L. (1998). Winning every day. New York: Harper Collins.
House, R.J. (1971). A path-goal theory of leaders effectiveness. AdministrativeScience Quarterly, 16, 321-328.
House, R.J. (1977). A 1976 theory of charismatic leadership. In Hunt, J.G., & Larson,L.L. (Eds.), Leadership: The cutting edge(pp.198-207). Carbondale, IL: SouthernIllinois University Press.
House, R.J., & Howell, J.M. (1992). Personality nd charismatic leadership.Leadership Quarterly, 3(2), 81-108.
House, R.J., Spangler, W.D.,& Woycke, J. (1991). Personality and charisma in theU.S.Presidency: A psychological theory of leader effectiveness. AdministrativeScience Quarterly, 36, 364-396.
Howell, J.M., & Avolio, B.J. (1993). Transformational leadership,transactionalleadership, locus of control, and support of innovation: Key predictors of consolidated business-unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(6),891-902.
Hoy, W.K., & Ferguson, J. (1985). A theoretical framework and exploration of organizational effectiveness of school. Educational Administration Quarterly ,21(2), 121-124.
Hoy, W.K., & Miskel, C.G. (1996). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice(5th Ed.). New York: Random House, Inc..
Hoy, W.K., & Miskel, C.G.(2001). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice(6th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Hoyle, J.R. (2002). Leadership and the force of love: Six keys to motivating with love.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (1987). Educational Administration: Theory, research, andpractice. New York: Random House.
Huberman, A.M., & Miles, M.B. (1984). Innovation up close: How school improvement works. New York: Random House.
Huges, L.W., & Ubben, G.C.(1989). The elementary principal’s handbook: A guide to effective action(3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Hunt, J.G. (1999). Transformational/charismatic leadership’s transformation of the field: An historical essay. Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 129-144.
Irby, B.J., Brown, G., & Duffy, J.A. (1999). A feminine inclusive leadership theory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Irby, B.J., Brown, G., & Duffy, J.A. (2000). Organizational and leadership effectiveness inventory. Huntsville, TX: Sam Houston Press.
Irby, B.J., Brown, G., & Duffy, J.A., & Trautman, D. (2001). Organizational and leadership effectiveness inventory(II). Huntsville, TX: Sam Houston Press.
Irby, B.J., Brown, G., Duffy, J.A., & Trautman, D. (2002). The synergistic leadership theory. Journal of Educational Administration, 40(4), 304-322.
Irby, B.J., Brown, G., & Trautman, D. (1999). Equalizing opportunities: Analysis of current leadership theory and its relationship to a feminine inclusive leadership theory. In Fenwick, L. (Ed.). School leadership: Expanding horizons of the mind and spirit. Lancaster,PA: Technomic.
Irby, B.J., Brown, G., & Trautman, D. (1999). Analysis of thirteen leadership theories for an androcentric bias.Paper presented at National Council of Professors ofEducational Administration. Jackson Hole Wyoming.
Irby, B.J., Brown, G., & Trautman, D. (2000). Giving rise to missing voices. Paperpresented at the annual meeting of the American Educational ResearchAssociation, New Orleans, LA.Iselt, C., Brown, G.,& Irby, B.(2001). Gender differences in superintendentsperceptions of superintendency preparation programs. Advances in research andtheories of school management and educational policy, JAI Press, Stanford, CT.
Jarvis, C. (2001). Business systems the bureaucratic model. Business Open LearningArchive. http://sol.brunel.as.uk.
Johnson, S.M. (1990). Teacher at work. Basic Books, A Division of Harper CollinsPublishers.
Johnson, S. A. (1989). Criteria for assessing the effectiveness of schools and principals. Education Candana, 15-16.
Jos, P., & Hines, S. (1993). Care, justice and public administration. Administration &Society, 25(3), 373-392.
Kavle, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research writing.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Keely,M.(1984).Impartiality andarticipant-interest the ories of organizationaleffectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29.
Kerr, S., & Jermier, J.M. (1978). Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning andmeasurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 375-403.
Kidwell, D.S., & Peterson, R.L. (1987). Financial institutions,markets, andmoney(3rd Ed.). New York, NY: The Dryden Press.
Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
Kotter, J.P., & Cohen, D.S. (2002). The heart of change: Real-life stories of howpeople change their organizations.Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.
Kouzes, J.M., & Posner, B.Z. (1987). The leadership and social change(3rd ed.). SanDiego: University Associates.
Kouzes, J.M., & Posner, B.V. (1999). Encouraging the heart: A leader’s guide torewarding and recognizing others. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kowalski, T. (1999). The school superintendent: Theory, practice, and cases. UpperSaddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall,Inc.
Kuczynski, M.G. (1986). Recent developments in business cycle theory. Journal ofEconomic Dynamics and Control, 10, 255-260.
Lashway, L. (1995). Can instructional leaders be facilitative leaders?. Eugene, OR:ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management.(ERIC DocumentReproduction Service No.ED381893)
Lashway, L. (2002). The superintendent in an age of accountability(Report No.EDOEA-02-08). Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educationalmanagement.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED468515)
Learning First Alliance. (1997). Learning first alliance. Washington, DC: Author.
Leithwood, K .(1994). Leadership for school restructuring. EducationalAdministration Quarterly, 30(4), 498-518.
Leithwood, K., & Duke, D.L. (1999). A century’s quest to understand schoolleadership. In J. Murphy, &K.S.Louis(Eds.),Handbook of research on educational administration(2nded.)(pp.45-72). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Levine, U.D., & Lezotte, W.L. (1990). Unusually effective school. The NationalCenter for Effective School Research and Development.
Levine, D. U., & Lezotte, L. W. (1990). Unusually effective schools. Madison: National Center for Effective Schools Research and Development. (ERIC Document ReproductionService NO. ED367016).
Lewis, D., & Ecob, R. (1988). School matters: The
junior years. Somerset: Open Books.
Lincoln, Y.S., & Cuba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry.Newbury Park, CA: SagePublication.
Lightfoot, S.L. (1983). The good high schools: Portraits of culture and character.New York: Basic Books, Inc.
Likert, R., & Likert, J.G. (1976). New ways of managing conflict. New York:McGraw-Hill.
Little, J.W. (1990). Conditions of professional development in secondary schools. InM.W. Mclaughlin et al.(Eds.), The contexts of teaching in secondary schools.New York: Teacher’s College Press.
Lunenburg, F.C.,& Ornstein, A.C. (2000). Educational administration concepts andpractices(3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
Lunenburg, F.C., & Ornstein, A.C. (2004). Educational administration concepts andpractices(4rd ed.). Stanford,CT: Wadsworth /Thomson Learning.
Lyotard, J. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. MinnesotaPress, Minneapolis, MN.
Macbeath, J. (2001a). Effective and improving school-What have we learned? Are weimproving? Symposium conducted at the meeting of the InternationalConference on “Knowledge Economy and Education Development”, Taipei,Taiwan.
Macbeath, J. (2001b). Beyond effectivnesse and improvement. Symposium conductedat the meeting of the International Conference on “Knowledge Economy andEducation Development”, Taipei, Taiwan.
Marshall, C. (Ed.)(1992). Women as school administrators. Phi Delta Kappa,Bloomington, IN.
Maslow, A.H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row.
Mayo, E. (1945). The social problems of an industrial civilization. Boston: GraduateSchool of Business Administration,Harvard University.
McCall, A.L. (1995). The bureaucratic restraints to caring in schools. In Dunlap, D.M.& Schmuck, P.A.(Eds.),Womenleadingin education(pp.180-196). Albany, NY:State University of New York Press.
McCall, M.W., Jr., & Lombardo, M.M.(Eds.).(1978). Leadership: Where else can wego? Durham,NC: Duke University Press.
McCormack-Larkin, M., & Kritek, W. (1983). Milwaukee’s project. Educational Leadership,40, 16-21.Mortimore, P., Sammons, P., Stoll, L.,
Merron, K.(1995). Riding the wave: Designing your organization’s architecture for enduring success. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Mescon, M.H., & Mescon, T.S. (1999). Small business insights. Atlanta Business Chronicle.
http://atlanta.bcentral.com.
Miskel, C.G., Fevurly, R., & Stewart, J. (1979).Organizational structures and processes, perceived school effectiveness, loyalty, and job satisfaction.Educational Administration Quarterly, 15(3), 97-118.
Moch, M., & Seashore, S.E. (1981). How norms affect behaviors in and of corporations. In P.C. Nystrom & W.H. Starbuck(Eds.), Handbook of organizational design(pp.210-237). Oxford: University Press.
Morgen, S. (1994). Personalizing personnel decisions in feminist organizational theory and practice. Human Relations, 46(6), 665-684.
Mortimore, P. (1987). School examination results in ILEA. London, Inner London Education Authority.
Mott, P.E. (1972). The characteristics of effective organizations. New York: Harper &Row Publishers.
Moye, D.C. (1996). Identification secondary principals’ visionary leadership levelsand their relationship with effective schools. Alabama University DoctoralDissertation.
Murphy, J. (1990). Principal instructional leadership. In Thurston,P.W., & Lotto, L.S.(Eds.). Advances in educational administration: Changing perspectives on theschool(pp.163-200). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Murphy, J., Hallinger, P., & Mesa, R.R. (1985). School effectiveness: Checkingprogress and assumptions and developing a role for state and federal govement.Teachers College Record, 86(4), 616-641.
Murphy, J., & Beck, L.G. (1995). School-based management as school reform :Taking stock .Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Murphy, J., Hallinger, P., & Mesa, R. R. (1985). School effectiveness: Checking progress and
assumptions and developing a role for state and federal government. Teachers CollegeRecord, 86(4), 616-641.
Nanus, B. (1992). Visionary leadership. San Franciso: Jossey-Bass.
Noddings, N. (1984). Fidelity in teaching, teacher education, and research for teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 56, 496-510.
Ogilvie, D., & Sadler, D.R. (1979). Perception of school effectiveness and its relationship to organizational climate. The Journal of Educational Administration , 7(2), 140-141.
Oldham, G.R., & Hackman, J.R. (1981). Relationships between organizational structure and employees reactions: Comparing alternative frameworks.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 66-83.
Ortiz, F.I., & Marshall, C. (1988). Women in educational administration. In Boyan,NJ.(Ed.), Handbook of research on educational administration, Longman,New York, NY, 123-141.
Papalewis, R. (1994). Women in educational leadership : A review of mainstream literature. A paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association Special Interest Group on Research onWomen and Education, St.Paul, MN.
Parsons, T. (1960). Structure and process in modern society. New York: Free Press.
Patton, M.Q. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods. Beverly Hill, CA: Sage.
Patton, M.Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Newbury Park ,NJ: Sage Publications.
Perrow, C. (1986). Complex organizations(3rd ed.). New York: Random House.
Persell, C.H., & Cookson, P.W., Jr .(1982). The effective principal in action: A research summary. Reston,Va: National Association of Secondary SchoolPrincipals.
Peters, T., & Waterman, R.(1993). In search of excellence. New York: Warner Press.
Pounder, D.G., Ogawa, R.T., & Adams, E.A.(1995). Leadership as anorganization-wide phenomena: Its impact on school performance. Educational
Administration Quarterly, 31(4), 564-588.
Powe, K. (1992). Visionary leadership and the waves of the future.(ERIC DocumentReproduction Service NO.ED355-635).
Price, J.L., & Mueller, C.M. (1986). Handbook of organizational measurement. NewYork: Pitman Publishing.
Purkey, S.C., & Smith, M. (1983). Effective school: A review.TheElementary SchoolJournal, 83(4), 427-452.
Reid, K., Hopkins, D., & Holly, P. (1987). Towards the effective school: The problems andsome solution. England: Basil Blackwell.
Reynolds, D. (1985). Studying school effectiveness. New York: The Flmer Press.
Reynolds, D. et al. (1996). School effectiveness and school improvement in the United Kingdom. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7(2), 133-158.
Robbins, S. (1990). Organizational theory : Structure, design, and applications.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Robbins, S. (1992). Organizational behavior.. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Robbins, S.P. (1998). Organizational behavior : Concepts, controversies, applications. Upper Saddle, NJ: Allyn and Bacon.
Rodgers, D.H. (1994). Perceived transformational leadership of elementary principals in effective schools. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 08A, 2834.
Rosener, J. (1990). Ways women lead. Harvard Business Review, 68(6), 119-125.
Rosener, J. (1995). America’s competitive secret: Women managers. New York:Oxford University Press.
Rowan, B. (1985). The assessment of school effectivement. In Regina, M.J.(Ed.), Reaching for excellence an effective schools sourcebook. Washington: US Government Printing Office.
Purkey, S., & Smith, M. (1983). Effective school: A review. The Elementary School Journal ,83(4), 427-452.
Rutter, M. et al. (1979). Fifteen thousand hours: Secondary school and their effect onchildren. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P., & Ouston, J. (1979).Fifteen thousand hours:Secondary schools and their effects on children. Wells: Open Books.
Salancik, G.R., & Pfeffer, J. (1977). Constraints on administrative discretion: The limited influence of mayors on city budgets. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 12,475-498.
Sashkin, M. (1986). True vision in leadership. The Training and Development Journal, 58-61.
Sashkin, M. (1988). The visionary leader. In J.A.Conger(Ed.),Charismatic leadership(pp.122 -160). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sashkin, M. (1990). The visionary leader: Leadership behavior questionnaire(3rdEd.). King of Prussia,PA: Organization Design and Development.
Sashkin, M. (1996). Becoming a visionary leader. Amherst, MA: HRD Press.
Scheerens, J. (1990). School effectiveness research and the development of processindicators of school functioning. School Effectiveness and School Improvement,1(1), 72-80.
Scheerens,J.(1992).Effectiveschooling research,theory and practice. New York:Cassell.
Scheerens, J., & Creemers, B. (1996). School effectiveness in the Netherlands: Themost influence of a research programme. School Effectiveness and SchoolImprovemet , 7(2), 181-195.
Scheerens, J. (1997). Conceptual models and theory embedded principles on effectiveschooling. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 8(3), 269-310.
Scheerens, J. (1990). School effectiveness research and the development of process indicatorsof school functioning. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1(1), 73.
Schein, E.H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
Schein, E.H. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership: A dynamic view. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Schlosberg, T.V. (2003a). Synergistic leadership : An international case study. Unpublished research paper, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, Texas.
Schlosberg, T.V. (2003b). An international case study:The transportability of the synergistic leadership theory to selected educational leaders in Mexico. Dissertation of the Sam Houston State University.
Seashore, S.E. (1983). A framework for an integrated model of organizational effectiveness. In Cameron, K.S. &Whetton, D.A. (Ed.), Organizational effectiveness: A comparison of multiple model. New York: Academic Press.
Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline. New York: Doubleday Publishing.
Sergiovanni, T.J. (1990). Value-added leadership: How to get extraordinary performance in schools. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Sergiovanni, T.J. (1992). Moral leadership: Getting to the heart of school improvement.. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sergiovanni, T.J. (2001). The principalship : A reflectictive practice perspective(4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Shafritz, J.M., & Ott, J.S.(2001). Introducation . In Shafritz, J.M. & Ott, J.S. (Eds.),Classics of organization theory(5th ed.,pp.1-7). Orlando,FL: Harcourt, Inc.
Shakeshaft, C. (1986). Women in education administration. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Shakeshaft, C. (1989). Women in education administration.Newbury Park: Sage.Shakeshaft, C. (1995). A cup half full: A gender critique of the knowledge base ineducational administration. In Donmoyer R., Imberg,m., & Scheurich, J.J. (Eds.),The knowledge base in educational administration(pp.139-140). Albany, NY:State University of New York Press.
Shakeshaft, C., & Nowell, I. (1984). Research on theories, concepts, and models oforganizational behavior: The influence of gender. Issues in Education, 2(3) ,186-200.
Shamir, B., & Howell, J.M. (1999). Organizational and contextual influences on theemergence and effectiveness of charismatic leadership. Leadership Quarterly,10(2), 257-283.
Shamir, B., House, R.J., & Arthur, M.B. (1993). The motivational effects ofcharismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4,1-17.
Shamir, B., Zokay, E., Breinin, E., & Popper, M. (1998). Correlates of charismaticleader behavior in mulitary units. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4),387-409.
Silins, H.C. (1994). The relationship between transformational and transactionalleadership and school improvement. School Effectiveness and SchoolImprovement, 5(3), 272-298.
Silverman,D.(1993). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text, and interaction. Newbury Park , NJ: Sage Publications.
Simon, H.A. (1976). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making process inadministrative organization. N.Y.: Free Press.
Sparrow, J., & Rigg, C. (1994). Job analysis: Selecting for the masculine approach tomanagement. Selection and Development Review, 9(2), 5-8.
Spero, S.D. (2004). An examination of teacher perceptions of school effectiveness inrelation to the State of Florida’s school improvement and accountability system.Dissertation of the University of Southern Mississippi.
Starratt. R.J. (1995). Leaders with vision: The quest for school renewal. ThousandOaks, California: Crowin Press.
Stefano, M.D. (2003).School effectiveness: The role of the principal in a leadingpublic secondary school in Santa Fe Province,Argentina. Dissertation of theColumbia University.
Stogdill, R.M. (1974). Handbook of leadership: A servey of theory and research. NewYork: Free Press.
Tallerico, M. (1999). Women and the superintendency: What do we really know? InBrunner, C.C. (Ed.), Scared dreams: Women and the superintendency. Albany,NY: State University of New York Press.
Tam, W.M., & Cheng, Y.C. (1996). A typology of primary school environment:Synergetic, headless,mediocre, and disengaged. Educational Management andAdministration ,24(3), 237-252.(U.K.)
Tannenbaum, R., & Schmidt, W.H. (1958). How to chooses leadership pattern?Harvard Business Review, 57, 92-106.
Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (1993). School make a difference: Lessons learned froma 10-year study of school effect. New York: Teachers College Press.
Teddlie, C., & Reynolds, D. (2000). The international handbook of schooleffectiveness research. Lonoon and New York: Falmer Press.
Thomas, K.W., & Kilmann, R.H. (1974). Thomas- Kilmann conflict mode instrument.Tuxedo, NY: Xicom, Inc.
Thurstone, L.L. (1928). Attitudes can be measured. American Journal of Sociology ,33, 529-554.
Togneri, W. (2003). Beyond islands of excellence: What districts can do to improveinstruction and achievement in all schools- A leadership brief.Washington,D.C.: Learning First Alliance.
Tong, R. (1989). Feminist thought. San Francisco, CA:Westview Press.Trautman, H.D. (2000). A validation of synergistic leadership theory: A genderinclusive leadership theory. (Doctoral Dissertation, Sam Houston StateUniversity, 2000). Dissertation Abstracts International, 62(2598).
Truslow, K.O. (2004). An analysis of gender differences of public schoolsuperintendents’ conflict management modes in relation to the synergisticleadership theory.Dissertation of the Sam Houston State University.
Uata, T.T. (2003). Synergistic leadership: The leadership paradigm for theknowledge-based golbal socio-economy. Dissertation of the PepperdineUniversity.
Vroom, V.H., & Yetton, P.W.(1973). Leadership and decision-making. Pittsburgh:University of Pittsburge Press.
Walsh, J. (2003). A look at the no child left behind act: Two years later. Texas SchoolAdministrators’ Legal Digest, 19(9), 1-5.
Weber, J. (1989). Leading the instructional program. In school leadership: Handbookfor excellence(2nd ed.). Oregon:ERIC Clearinghouse.
Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. New York:Oxford University Press.
Weber, M. (1963). Organizations: Structure and behavior. New York: John Wiley.
Weber, G. (1971). Inner city children can be taught to read: Four successfulschools.(ERIC Document Reproducation Service No.ED130243).
Weber, J. (1989). Leading the instructional program. In Smith, S.C., & Piele,P.K(Eds.), School leadership: Handbook for excellence(2nd ed.)(pp.191-224).Eugene,Oregon:ERICClearinghouse on Educational Management. ED309504.
Windham, D. M. (1988). Effectiveness indicators in the economic analysis of educationalactivities. International Journal of Educational Research, 12, 575-666
Wohlstetter, P., & Mohrman, S.A.(1994). School-based management: Promise and process. Finance briefs. Retrieved July 21, 2005, from U.S. Department of
Education Web Site:http://www/ed.gov/pubs/CPRE /fb5sbm.html
Wolf, J., & Ball, E. (1999). Empowering staff to support organizational objectives:Creating an administrative environmentthatfostersharmony, loyalty,andteamwork. Encintas, CA: Learning for Life.
Womack, D.F. (1988). A review of conflict instruments in organizational settings.Management Communication Quarterly, 1(3), 437-445.
Young, K.L. (1983). Understanding accreditation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Yukl, G.A. (1994). Leadership in organizations(3nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
Yukl, G.A. (1998). Leadership in organizations(4 nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
Yukl, G.A. (2006). Leadership in organizations(5 nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
Yukl, G.A. (2014). Leadership in organizations(6 nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
Zimmerman, J. (1997). The culture of success: Building a sustained competitiveadvantage by living your corporate beliefs. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.