:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國民小學校長變革領導與學校經營績效之研究─以動態能力為干擾變項
作者:李政穎
作者(外文):Cheng-ying Lee
校院名稱:國立臺南大學
系所名稱:教育經營與管理研究所博士班
指導教授:丁學勤
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2012
主題關鍵詞:校長變革領導學校經營績效動態能力principal change leadershipschool management performancedynamic capabilities
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:62
隨著全球化、市場化競爭的來臨,學校組織已從過去被視為一種靜態的結構,轉化成能適應內外社會環境變遷、能成長與發展的有機體,論及學校經營績效好壞的同時,需要瞭解到校長就是學校裡綜理校務的領導者,有績效的校長,正是促使學校變革發生的關鍵人物。因此,透過校長的領導將學校帶領到什麼樣的方向、是否發揮良好的經營績效,確實是很值得研究的議題。再者,本研究以動態能力為干擾變項,探討其在校長變革領導運用對學校經營績效上的影響。
本研究採取調查研究法,以台灣公立國民小學教師為研究對象,採取分層立意抽樣的方式,共計獲得681名教師的有效問卷。有效回收問卷後先利用線性結構關係模式(LESREL)進行驗證性因素分析,再採線性關係模式(LISREL)驗證校長變革領導與學校經營績效間的因果模式與相互關係,之後利用SPSS12.0版統計套裝軟體進行階層迴歸分析,以了解動態能力在校長變革領導與學校經營績效間的干擾情形。研究發現與貢獻有兩點:1.校長變革領導對學校經營績效有正向影響;2.動態能力會干擾校長變革領導對學校經營績效的影響效果;動態能力愈佳會強化其間的影響效果。最後,根據研究結果提出結論與建議,以供學校及未來研究之參考。
As the coming of the competition by globalization and marketization, the school becomes an organism of adapting inner and outer environment changes and being growthful and developing from static structure. Talking about the school management performance, we should understand the principal is the leader of the school. A principal who has good performance is the key of promoting school change. It is an issue worthy to research about whether the principal brings good management performance or leads the school to be what kinds of situation.
The dynamic capabilities are considered in this study to exam the moderator of the influences of the change leadership of the elementary school principal on the school management performance.
The study employed the questionnaire survey method. The objects were elementary school teachers in Taiwan. With stratified purpose sampling, 681 teachers were taken as research effective samples according to school scale. In the light of the valid questionnaires, this research conducts a confirmatory factor analysis by linear structural relationship model (LISREL). In order to prove the cause and effect way and interrelation of the principal’s change leadership and school management performance by LISREL. And to understand the influence of moderator by computer software SPSS version 12.0. The statistics method is hierarchical regression analysis. Conclusions and Contributions obtained from this research are as follows: 1.The principal change leadership has positive influence on the school management performance. 2.On the moderating effects of dynamic capabilities, while the higher dynamic capabilities, the stronger positive influence of the principal change leadership and the school management performance. Bases on the results this research, some conclusions and suggestions for schools and future study were proposed.
參考文獻
壹、中文部分
王睦舜(2010)。智慧資本與經營績效。亞太經濟管理評論,14(1),67-88。new window
王嬋媚(2004)。高中職轉型為綜合高中組織變革、教師角色壓力與工作倦怠相關之研究─以社會支持為干擾變項(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學,高雄市。
司徒達賢(1999)。非營利組織的經營管理。台北:天下文化。
司徒達賢(2001)。策略管理新論:觀念架構與分析方法。台北:智勝。
江志正(1999)。國民小學團體動力、組織學習、學校發展策略與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。new window
江志正(2008)。教育變革時代中談永續領導。教育研究月刊,171,58-67。new window
江澈(2007)。私立高級中學校長競值領導、教師專業承諾、組織創新與組織績效關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
行政院教育改革審議委員會(1996)。教育改革總諮議報告書。台北:行政院。
余佩佩(2002)。全面品質管理、供應商選擇、供應商參與、資訊運籌管理與組織績效關係之研究:台灣、香港之比較分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,台南市。
吳昌期(2006)。國民小學校長變革領導、組織學習與組織文化關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,台北市。new window
吳明清(1998)。鬆綁後的學校教育改革課題。教師天地,95,8-14。
吳明隆(2008)。結構方程模式。台北:五南。
吳明雅(2009)。台北縣市國民小學校長變革領導與學校創新經營效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,台北市。
吳勁甫(2007)。競值架構應用在國民小學校長領導行為與學校組織效能關係之研究。教育政策論壇,9(2),155-186。new window
吳若瑛(2007)。國民小學校長變革領導策略之研究-以桃園縣三所國民小學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,台北市。

吳培源(1995)。臺灣省高級中學校長領導型態、學校氣氛與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。new window
吳清山(1998)。學校效能研究。台北:五南。new window
吳清山(2002)。教育改革的未來。國科會人文及社會科學發展處教育學門成果發表論文集。台北:師大教研中心。new window
吳清山(2004)。學校創新經營的理念與策略。教師天地,128,30-44。new window
吳清山(2005)。學校效能研究的價值。教育研究集刊,51(2),133-139。new window
吳清山、林天祐(2005)。教育新辭書。台北:高等教育。
吳清基(1989)。教育與行政。台北:師大書苑。
吳靜宜(2010)。學校組織氣氛、教師權能、教師集體效能與學校經營績效關係之研究-以臺中縣公立國中為例(未出版之碩士論文)。大葉大學,彰化縣。
李明堂(2006)。學校組織變革歷程及管理策略之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立屏東教育大學,屏東縣。new window
李建昇(2007)。領導者動態能力與組織動態能力關係效之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學,新北市。
李貞儀(2010)。學校推動試辦教師專業發展評鑑計畫之微觀政治分析。東海教育評論,4,52-93。
李貞儀(2011)。國民小學校長變革領導、教師組織信任、教師組織公民行為與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立中正大學,高雄市。new window
周永琮(2010)。企業使命願景、理念價值與經營績效之關係探索─以製造業為例(未出版之碩士論文)。輔仁大學,新北市。
周瓊婉(2006)。知識管理策略、學校本位管理與學校效能關聯性之探討─以臺南市國民小學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。立德管理學院,台南市。new window
林天祐(2000)。教育行政革新。台北:心理。new window
林明地(2001)。轉型領導與超越轉型領導。師鐸,16,90-103。
林明地(2002)。學校領導:理念與校長專業生涯。台北:高等教育。
林明地(2005)。校長領導、權力運用與關懷專業。教育研究月刊,132,59-69。new window



林金福(1992)。國民中學校長領導型式與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,台北市。
林哲弘(2008)。動態能力本質及其分析架構之探索(未出版之碩士論文)。東海大學,台中市。
林海清(1993)。台灣省公立高級中等學校校長甄選制度之研究。政大教育與心理學報,16。
林素吟(2005)。產品保證與品牌知名度對顧客忠誠度的影響之研究。中華管理評論國際學報,8(1)。
林意資(2010)。國民中學教師知覺校長願景領導與學校效能關係之研究:以中部三縣市為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
林新發(1990)。我國工業專科學校校長領導行為、組織氣氛與組織績效關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,台北市。new window
邱皓政(2003)。結構方程模式—LISREL的理論、技術與應用。台北:雙葉。
侯世昌(2002)。國民小學家長教育期望、參與學校教育與學校效能之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,台北市。new window
侯嘉政(2008)。企業動態能力與創業管理之研究。創業管理研究,3(2),1-28。new window
侯嘉政、鍾岳群(2009)。動態能力、顧客知識管理能力與經營績效關係之研究。電子商務學報,11(4),673-696。new window
范慶鐘(2010)。國民小學校長多元架構領導、學校組織健康、教師專業承諾與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義市。new window
徐俊祺(2009)。桃園縣國民小學組織氣氛與學校效能之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,台北市。
徐國樹(2008)。公立高級職業學校組織變革與校長變革領導對學校經營策略研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。
秦夢群(2004)。教育行政—理論部份。台北:五南。
秦夢群(2005)。教育行政-理論部分(四版)。台北:五南。
秦夢群、吳勁甫、濮世緯(2007)。校長轉型、交易領導與教師工作滿意關係之後設分析。教育與心理研究,30(4),27-55。new window
高強華(2002)。開放教育中的課程統整與課程革新。載於高強華(主編),學校組織與課程革新(8-27頁)。台北市:國立臺灣師範大學。new window
張仁川(2001)。特殊學校校長領導特質與學校效能之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
張永欽(2002)。臺北市立國小校長領導行為塑造學校組織文化與學校效能之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北師範學院,台北市。
張宏榮(2010)。動態能力與變革策略關係之探索性研究:臺灣電動代步車廠商之多個案比較分析(未出版之博士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義市。new window
張宏榮、侯嘉政(2008年6月)。整合行銷溝通之調查研究:以YS公司產品為例。產學合作成果與學術研討會,環球技術學院行銷管理系。
張明輝(2004)。平衡計分卡制度在學校績效管理之應用。教育研究月刊,124,19-25。new window
張明輝(2009)。學校經營與管理新興議題研究。台北:學富。new window
張鈿富(2009)。變革領導理念與應用。教育研究月刊,179,16-17。new window
張慶勳(1996)。國小校長轉化、互易領導影響學校組織文化特性與組織效能之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市new window
張慶勲(2004)。學校組織行為。台北:五南。
張潤書(1998)。行政學。台北:三民。
莊清寶(2010)。學校本位財務管理、學校創新經營與學校效能關係之研究:以國中小特色學校為例(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學,台北市。new window
郭生玉(1995)。心理與教育測驗。台北:精華。
郭添財(2009)。學校績效管理─平衡計分卡的內涵、應用及限制。國教之友,60(2),3-7。
陳弘宜(2010)。嘉義縣國小校長推動願景領導與學校效能之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義市。
陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵(2005)。多變量分析方法—統計軟體應用。台北:五南。
陳梅珍(2006)。企業願景、經營策略、執行力與經營績效之研究-以國軍N工廠為例(未出版之碩士論文)。樹德科技大學,高雄市。
陳嘉碩(2002)。人力資源管理的績效評估對改進公部門考績制度之啟發-南投地區政府機關的觀點(未出版之碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學,南投縣。
曾仲傑(2010)。臺北市國民小學學校組織氣氛與教師效能感關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學,台北市。
黃芳銘(2006)。社會科學統計方法學:結構方程模式。台北:五南。
黃貞裕(2005)。學校組織動態能耐評量指標建構與實證之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學,台北市。new window
楊少璇(2003)。高等教育的競爭策略—以四所大學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,台南市。
楊文環(2010)。高雄縣國小校長變革領導、學校組織氣氛與校長領導效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
楊振昇(2006)。教育組織變革與學校發展研究。台北:五南。new window
葉蘇華(2006)。整合知識管理基礎建設、知識管理流程、知識效能剖析其對於組織效能之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。南台科技大學,台南市。
廖述賢、張文榮(2010)。市場導向、創新能力、行銷能力與經營績效。商略學報,2(2),1-19.new window
劉仲成(2004)。教育市場化學校經營的策略。教育資料與研究,57,45-49。new window
劉明德(1993)。管理學-競爭優勢。台北:桂冠。
蔡孟芳(2008)。臺中市國民小學校長變革領導與教師教學創新之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。逢甲大學,台中市。
蔡宜璇(2009)。虛擬團隊中娛樂性、團隊願景與績效之關係:社會支持之中介效果(未出版之碩士論文)。朝陽科技大學,台中市。
蔡炳坤(2007)。高中校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校組織效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學,台北市。new window
鄭偉修、黃鴻程(2003)。預測變革-21世紀企業變革之道。台北:水星。
鄭彩鳳(1996)。競值途徑應用在高中職校長領導角色、學校組織文化與組織效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。new window
鄭彩鳳(2003)。學校行政-理論與實務。高雄:麗文。
鄭彩鳳(2004)。學校績效管理與績效責任。教育研究月刊,124,5-21。new window
鄭莉伶(2006)。高雄縣國民小學教師知覺校長家長式領導、學校組織溝通與組 織效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
鄭燕祥(2001)。學校效能及校本管理:發展的機制。台北:心理。new window
鄭燕祥(2006)。教育範式轉變:效能保證。台北:高等教育。new window
賴協志(2008)。國民小學校長知識領導、組織學習與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。台北市立教育大學,台北市。new window
錢幼蘭(2007)。國民中學校長變革領導與經營績效關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺南大學,台南市。new window
謝文全(2005)。教育行政學。台北:高等教育。
謝文全(2007)。教育行政學。台北:高等教育。
謝文豪(2004)。國民小學校長之變革關注與變革領導策略之探討。花蓮師院學報,18,1-30。new window
鍾以勇(2009)。Learning Organization, Typologies of Learning Pattern and Their Links to Organizational Performance for Knowledge -intensive organizations。電子商務學報,11(1),51-94。
鐘志長(2006)。學校變革之意義與觀點對變革領導者的啟示。研習資訊,23(3),131-138。
藍光炤(2006)。高雄市國民小學校長領導特質、教師組織公民行為與組織效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。高雄師範大學,高雄市。
顏童文(2007)。國民小學組織動態能耐、組織健康氣候與學校創新經營關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學,台北市。new window
關永實(1992)。目標管理與績效評估。台北:銓敘部編行政管理論文選輯第6輯。
蘇美娟(2010)。教師知覺國民中學校長魅力領導、學校組織氣氛與學校效能關係之研究~以中部六縣市為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。

貳、英文部分
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Ambrosini, V., & Bowman, C. (2009). What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), 29-49.
Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. (1993). Strategic assets and organisational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (1), 33-46.
Ancona, D., & Caldwell, D. (1992). Demography and design:Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 3,321-341.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103 (3), 411-423.
Anderson, R. D., & Anderson, D. H. (2003). Teacher and principal concerns: The implementation of benchmark testing. Planning and Changing, 16, 96-104
Anderson, S. E. (2001). Principal’s management style and patterns of teacher implementation across multiple innovations. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2 (4), 286-304.
Aoki, M. (1990). Towards an economic model of the Japanese firm. Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1-27.
Avolio, B. (2005). Leadership development in balance. Mahwah, NJ. Lawrence & Erlbaum.
Avolio, B. J., & Gibbons, T. C. (1998). Developing transformational leaders: A life span approach. In J.A. Conger, & R.N. Kanungo (Eds.), Charismatic leadership: The elusive factor in organizational effectiveness (pp.276-308). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Barnard, C. I. (1948). Organization and management: Selected papers, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management Science, 17, 99-120.
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership: A response to critiques. In M.M. Chemers, & R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership theory and research: Perspectives and direction (pp.49-88). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Bierly, P. E., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (1996). Technological learning, strategic flexibility, and new product development in the pharmaceutical industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Managemen, 43, 368-380.
Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper and Row.
Calhoun, K. J. (2004). Superintendent change leadership strategies associated with successful technology integration in public school districts. LA:University of LA VERNE.
Campbell, J. P. (1977). The cutting edge of leadership: An overview. In J.G.Hunt & L.L. Larson. Leadership: The cutting edge. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.
Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp.687-732). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Certo, S. C. (2003). Modem management. New Jersey: Prentive Hall.
Cetindamar, D., Phaal, R., & Probert, D. (2009). Understanding technology management as a dynamic capability: A framework for technology management activities. Technovation, 29, 237-246.
Coleman, J. S. (1995). Achievement-oriented school design. In: Hallinan, M.T. (Ed.), Restructuring schools: Promising practices and policies. Plenum, New York. 11-29.
Cronbach, L. J. (1987). Statistical tests for moderator variables: Flaws in analyses recently proposed. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 414-417.
Daft, L. R. (2005). The leadership experience (3th ed.). Toronto: Webcom Limited.
Dalin, P., & Kitson, K. (1997). School development: Theories & strategies. Hardcover: Cassell Press.
Denison, D. R. (1990). Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
Drucker, P. F. (1995). Post-capital society. NY: Harper Business.
Eisenhardt, K., & Martin, J. (2000). Dynamic Capability: What are they?. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105-1121.
Eric, F., & Shaoming, Z. (2009). Antecedents and Consequences of Marketing Dynamic Capabilities in International Joint Ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(2009), 742–761.
Erik, R., Raymond, A., & Keith, F. (2009). Dynamic Capabilities and e-Service. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 26(2009), 301–315.

Firestone, W. A., & Wilson, B. L. (1993). Bureaucratic and cultural linkages: Implications for the principal. In M. Sashkin & H. T. Wallberg (Eds.), Educational leadership and school culture. (pp.19-39). Berkley, CA: McCutchan Publishing Corporation.
Frank, T. R., & Andrew, M. H. (2007). Building Dynamic Capabilities: Innovation Driven by Individual-, Firm-, and Network-Level Effects. Organization Science, 18(6), 898–921.
Frase, L. E., & Melton, R. G. (1992). Manager or participatory leader? What does it take? NASSP Bulletin, 76(540),17-24.
Fullan, M. (2004). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership and sustainability: System thinkers in action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Fullan, M. G. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. London: Cassell Educational Limited.
Gilley, A., Jerry, W., & McMillan, H. S. (2009). Organizational change: Motivation, communication, and leadership effectiveness. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 21(4), 75-94.
George, J., & Jones, G. (2002). Organizational behavior. (8th ed.). John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Goldring, E. B., & Rallis, S. F. (1993). Principals of dynamic schools: Taking charge of change. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
Grace, G. (1995). School leadership: Beyond education management. London: Falmer Press.
Grant, R. M. (1996). Prospering in dynamically competitive environment: organizational capability as knowledge iIntegration. Organization Science, 7(4), 375-387.
Hair, J. E., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2001). Implementing change: Patterns, principles and potholes. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Helfat, C. E. (1997). Know-how and asset complementarily and dynamic capability accumulation: The case of R&D. Strategic Management Journal, 18(5), 339-360.

Hou, J. J. (2008). Toward a research model of market orientation and dynamic capabilities. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 36(9), 1251-1268.
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2003). Studies in leading and organizing schools. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2008). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice.(8th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Hunt, S. D., & Morgan, R. M. (1995). The Comparative Advantage Theory of Competition. Journal of Marketing, 59, 1-15.
Iansiti, M., & Clark, K. B. (1994). Integration and dynamics capability: evidence from product development in automobiles and mainframe computers. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3, 557-605.
Ireh, M., & Bailey, J. (1999). A study of superintendents’ change leadership styles using the situational leadership model. American Secondary Education, 27(4), 22-32.
Jackson, D. (2000). The school improvement journey: Perspectives on leadership. School Leadership & Management, 20(1), 61-78.
Jianwen, L., Jill, R., & Hao, M. (2009). Organizational Dynamic Capability and Innovation: An Empirical Examination of Internet Firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(3), 263-286.
Kanter, R. M. (1999). Change in everyone’s job: Managing the extended enterprise in a globally extended world. Organizational Dynamics, 28(1), 7-23.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review, 1, 75-85.
Kelloway, E. K. (1998). Using LISREL for structural equation modeling: A researcher’s guide. Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage Publications, Inc.
Klievink, B., & Janssen, M. (2009). Realizing joined-up government — Dynamic capabilities and stage models for transformation. Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 275-284.
Kor, Y. Y., & Mahoney, J. T. (2005). How dynamics, management, and governance of resource deployments influence firm-level performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(5), 489-496.
Kotter, J. (1998). Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail. Harvard Business Review on change. MA: Harvard Business Review Publishing, 1-20.
Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Kotter, J. P., & Cohen, D. S. (2002). The heart of change. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
Lee, V., & Kelley, E. (2008). Building dynamic capabilities for innovation: An exploratory study of key management practices. R&D Management, 38(2), 155-168.
Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities. Strategic Management Journal. Summer special issue, 111-126.
Lieberman, M. (1990). Public school choice. Lancaster, PA: Techomics.
Lopez, M. (2003). The behaviors of effective urban school principals. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado at Denver, CO.
Lundberg, C. (1985). On the Feasibility of Culture Intervention in Frost, P, Moore, L, Louis, M, Lundberg, C. Organisational Culture Newbury . Park.Sage Publications. California. 69-185
Lunenburg, F. C., & Ornstein, A. C. (1991). Educational administration: Concepts and practices. Belmont, CA:Wadsworth.
Luo, Y. (2000). Dynamic capabilities in international expansion. Journal of World Business, 35(4), 355-378.
Madhok, A., & Osegowitsch, T. (2000). The international biotechnology industra: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Jounal of International Business Studies, 31(2), 325-335.
Malik, R., & Kotabe, M. (2009). Dynamic capabilities, government policies, and performance in firms from emerging economies: Evidence from India and Pakistan. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), 421-450.
Mark, E. S., Marjorie, A. L., & Margaret, A. P. (2009). Dynamic capabilities: Current debates and future directions. British Journal of Management, 20(1), 1-8.
Mathiassen, L., & Vainio, M. (2008). Dynamic capabilities in small software firms: A sense-and-respond approach. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54(3), 522-538.

Murphy, J., & Louis, K. S. (1994). Reshaping the principalship: Insights from transformational reform efforts. Newbury Park: Corwin Press.
Murphy, J., & Louis, K. S. (1999). Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Narayanan, V. K., Colwell, K., & Douglas F. L. (2009). Building organizational and scientific platforms in the pharmaceutical industry: A process perspective on the development of dynamic capabilities. British Journal of Management, 20, 25-40.
Navarro, J. R., & Gallardo, F. O. (2003). A model of strategic change: Universities and dynamic capabilities. Higher Education Policy, 16(1), 199-212.
Owens, R. (1999). Organizational behavior in education (6th ed). Boston, MA:Sllyn and Bacon.
Paul, P. M. (2010). Resources, Capabilities, and Service: Commentary on “Dynamic Capabilities and e-Service”. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 27(3), 76–77.
Pavlou, P. A. (2004). IT-Enabled dynamic capabilities in the new product development: Building a competitive advantage in the turbulent environments. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Southern California.
Pavlou, P. A., & Sawy, O. A. (2006). From IT competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development. Information Systems Research, 17(3), 198–227.
Pete, T., & Valentina, M. (2010). Dynamic Capabilities and Base of the Pyramid Business Strategies. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(2), 495–514.
Porter, J. W. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 603-609.
Quinn, R. E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science, 29(3), 363-377.
Robbins, S. P. (2001). Organizational behavior (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Robbins, S. P. (2002). Essentials of organizational behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Rowan, B. (1985). The assessment of school effectiveness. In Regina,M.J.(ed.). Reaching of excellence an effective schools sourcebook. Washington: U.S.Government Printing Office.
Sallis, E., & Jones, G. (2002). Knowledge management in education. London: Kogan Page Limited.
Scheerens, J., & Bosker, R. J. (1997). The foundations of educational effectiveness. Oxford:Elsevier Science Ltd.
Schentler, P., Linder, F., & Gleich, R. (2010). Innovation performance measurement. In A. Gerybadze, U. Hommel, H. Reiners & D. Thomaschewski, (Eds.), Innovation and international corporate growth, 99, 299-318.
Schermerhorn, J. R. (1999). Experience in management and organizational behavior. The Academy of Management Review, 23(1),138-142.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: Unwin.
Segan, P. E. (1986). Planned change and implementation in the connecticut schooleffectiveness program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Fordham University.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday Currency.
Seyfarth, J. (1999). The principal: New leadership for new challenges. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Stein, R., & King, B. (1992). Is restructuring a treat to principals’ power? NASSP Bulletin, 76(540), 26-31.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 18,509-533.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. In D. Giovanni, R. R. Nelson & S. G. Winter (Eds.). The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities.(pp.334-362). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (2004). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. In M. L. Tushman & P. Anderson (Eds.). Managing strategic innovation and change. (pp.308-332). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Tichy, N. M. (1993). Revolutionize your company. Fortune, 128, 114-122.
Todorovic, Z. W. (2004). The entrepreneurial orientation of university departments and its relationship to the incidence of commercial activity. Unpublished dissertation of university of waterloo, Ontario.
Van Scotter, J. R. (2000). Relationships of task performance and contextual performance with turnover, job satisfaction, and affective commitment. Human resource management review, 10(1), 79-95.
Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujan, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research. Academy of management journal, 13, 109-122.
Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. International journal of management reviews, 9(1), 31-51.
Weber, M. (1946). Bureaucracy. Oxford Press
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic manage-ment Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
Wirth, R. A. (2004). The relationship between self-leadership and self-initiated change leadership: Personal empowerment for emergent organizational change. Walden University
Zahra, S., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of management review, 27(2), 185-203.
Zahra, S., Sapienza, H., & Davidsson, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, model and research agenda. Journal of management studies, 43 (4), 917-955.
Zaltman, G., & Burger, P. G. (1985). Marketing research: fundamentals and dynamics. Taipei : Hwa Tay.
Zollo, M., & Winter, S. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization science, 13(3), 339-351.
Zott, C. (2003). Dynamic capabilities & the emergence of intra-industry differential firm performance: Insights from a simulation study. Strategic management journal, 24(2), 97-125.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE