:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國民小學分布式領導、教師組織承諾與學校創新經營效能關係之研究
作者:黃玉貞
校院名稱:國立政治大學
系所名稱:教育研究所
指導教授:秦夢群
吳政達
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2013
主題關鍵詞:分布式領導教師組織承諾學校創新經營效能distributed leadershipteacher’s organizational commitmentschool innovation management effectiveness
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(13) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:147
本研究主要目的在探析國民小學分布式領導、教師組織承諾與學校創新經營效能間之現況、差異與其關係。研究採用調查研究法,以臺灣北區五縣市(臺北市、新北市、基隆市、宜蘭縣與桃園縣)80所公立國民小學教師為研究對象,共計發出1000份問卷,最後回收873份有效問卷,有效問卷回收率為87.3%。問卷調查結果採用描述性統計、t考驗、單因子變異數分析及結構方程式等方法加以分析。
本研究主要研究發現為:一、目前國民小學分布式領導情況良好,以「領導能量的投入」最佳;二、公立國小教師之教師組織承諾情形良好,以「努力意願」最強;三、目前國小學校創新經營效能表現良好,以「課程教學創新經營效能」最佳;四、教師服務年資、擔任職務、學校規模與學校歷史等背景變項,在國民小學分布式領導、教師組織承諾與學校創新經營效能上具顯著差異情形;五、國民小學分布式領導、教師組織承諾與學校創新經營效能之整體結構模型獲得支持;六、國民小學分布式領導可透過教師組織承諾,增強對學校創新經營效能之正向影響力;七、教師組織承諾在國民小學分布式領導對於學校創新經營效能的影響上,具有部分中介影響效果。
最後,依據研究結果提出主要結論與相關建議,以供教育行政機關、國民小學與後續相關研究之參酌。
The purpose of this study is to explore the situation, difference and its relationship between distributed leadership, teacher’s organizational commitment, and school innovation management effectiveness. Data were collected from 873 teachers of 80 Elementary Schools in Taipei City, New Taipei City, Keelung City, Taoyuan County, and Ilan County. The data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA, and structural equation modeling (SEM). Finally, the findings of this study are as follows:
1.The perceptions from the elementary school teachers regarding distributed leadership are positive. The item “investment in leadership capacity” was the highest.
2.The perceptions from the elementary school teachers regarding teacher’s organizational commitment are positive. The item “the willing to make effort” was the highest.
3.The perceptions from the elementary school teachers regarding school innovation management effectiveness are positive. The item “curriculum and instructional innovation management effectiveness” was the highest.
4.The effects of different teacher’ seniority, duty, school sizes, and school history on distributed leadership, teacher’s organizational commitment, and school innovation management effectiveness were significantly differently.
5.The relationships of SEM among distributed leadership, teacher’s organizational commitment, and school innovation management effectiveness were demonstrated to be positive structural relationships.
6.The results from the Structural Equation Model indicated that there was a positive indirect effect between distributed leadership and school innovation management effectiveness when teachers’ organizational commitment served as a mediating variable.
7.The effect of teacher ’organizational commitment was partly mediated between distributed leadership and school innovation management effectiveness.
At least, according to the results, this study provides the conclusion and the suggestions particularly for the institution of educational administration, elementary schools and future research.
Keywords:distributed leadership, teacher’s organizational commitment, school innovation management effectiveness.
壹、中文部分
丁虹(1987)。企業文化與組織承諾之關係研究。國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北。new window
毛連塭(2000)。創造力研究的發展。載於毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台等(主編),創造力研究(p56-124)。臺北市:心理。new window
王念孟(2005)。運用結構方程式探討領導型態、組織文化、組織承諾、組織學習、知識管理以及組織績效之關係-以保險金融產業為例。國立東華大學企業管理研究所,碩士論文,未出版,花蓮市。
王欣蘭(2008)。臺北縣特色學校校長轉型領導行為與學校創新經營關係之研究。淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所碩士班論文,未出版,新北市。
王昭人(2011)。臺北市國小校長分布式領導、教師效能感與教師組織承諾關係之研究。國立政治大學教育行政與政策研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
王美惠(2005)。國民小學校長轉型領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究-以台北縣國民小學為例。淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所碩士論文,未出版,新北市。
王環鈴(2011)。臺中市國民小學分布式領導與學校創新經營之研究。東海大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺中市。new window
王麗雅(2011)。國民小學分布式領導與教師服務士氣之研究:以教師內外控信念為調節變項。國立臺南大學教育經營與管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺南市。
田維仁(2011)。國民小學分布式領導與教師組織公民行為關係之研究。逢甲大學公共政策所碩士論文,未出版,臺中市。
白崇亮(1986)。組織承諾研究:理論與實證。管理評論,5,30-51。new window
向家逸(2010)。分佈式領導、教師組織公民行為與教師集體效能感關係之研究:以桃園縣國小為例。中原大學教育研究所士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
江志軒(2011)。苗栗縣國民小學校長分布式領導、教師組織公民行為與教師工作滿意度關係之研究。國立政治大學教育行政與政策研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
江英君(2010)。基隆市國民小學學校創新經營之研究。臺北市立教育大學教育行政與評鑑研究所學校行政碩士班,未出版碩士論文,臺北市。
何建霖(2009)。國民小學分佈式領導、教師同僚專業互享與學生學習表現之研究。國立中正大學教育學研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式:SIMPLIS 的應用。臺北市:高等教育。
吳百祿(2010)。中小學教師領導者之理念及其對我國學校教育的啟示。教育政策論壇,13(2),129-158。new window
吳佳玲(2007)。國民小學內部行銷作為與教師組織承諾關係之研究-以桃竹苗四縣市為例。國立新竹教育大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
吳明隆(2007)。結構方程模式-AMOS的操作與應用。臺北市:五南。
吳素菁(2004)。學校創新經營之研究:以四所國民小學為例。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
吳清山(1998)。學校效能研究。臺北市:五南。new window
吳清山(2004)。學校組織創新經營與策略。教師天地,128,30-44。
吳清山(2005)。學校創新經營方案之建構。中等教育,56(3),4-26。new window
吳清山、林天祐(2003)。創新經營。教育資料與研究,53,134-135。new window
吳清山、林天祐(2005)。教育新辭書。臺北市:高等教育。
吳清山、林天祐(2010)。教育名詞:分布式領導。教育資料與研究雙月刊,95,149-150。
吳清山、賴協志(2006)。國民中小學學校創新經營成效、阻力與因應途徑之研究。教育研究月刊,141,58-74。new window
吳翎綺(2005)。國民小學校長變革領導與教師組織承諾之研究。國立屏東師範學院教育行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東市。
吳慧君(2004)。主管領導型態、行政人員自我效能、組織承諾與工作滿意度關係之究--以某私立醫學大學為例。國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所在職專班碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
巫俐敏(2007)。國民中小學學校創新經營之理念與實務。取自: http://www.nhu.edu.tw/~society/e-j/64/64-37.htm
李尚儒(2010)。國民小學校長分佈式領導、學校知識創造對學生學習表現影響之研究。國立新竹教育大學人資處教育行政碩士專班碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
李新鄉(2004)。創意領導與創新的學校經營─組織心理學的探索觀點。載於現代教育論壇-面對新世紀學校創意經營論文集(p42-49),嘉義市:嘉義大學。
汪宗明(2006)。國民小學知識延續管理與學校創新經營關係之研究—以臺北縣、桃園縣為例。國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
周婉玲(2011)。臺北市國民中學校長變革領導、教師組織承諾與學校創新經效能關係之探究。國立政治大學教育學院學校行政碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
林月盛(2003)。國民中學教改壓力、組織衝突、權力運用與組織承諾關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,高雄市。new window
林志興(2007)。臺中縣國民小學校長轉型領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究。國立臺中教育大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,臺中市。
林明地、連俊智(2008)。學校領導社群的意涵與塑造。教育研究,171,16-27。new window
林俊瑩(2010)。工作滿意度、組織承諾與離職意圖:中小學教師與其他職業之比較。教育實踐與研究,23(1),1-30。new window
林政宏(2004)。國民小學教師覺知教育改革壓力、組織承諾與學校效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
林炯炘(2005)。國民小學啟智班教師組織承諾與教學效能之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系所碩士論文,未出版,彰化市。
林衍伸 (2009)。屏東縣國民小學校長道德領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東市。
林新發、王秀玲、黃秋鑾、仲秀蓮、顏如芳、鄧珮秀(2007)。國民小學校長變革領導、學校文化對學校創新經營效能影響之研究-以臺灣北部地區三縣市為例。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(NSC95-2413-H -152-005),臺北市:國立臺北教育大學教育學院。new window
林瑞軒(2011)。國民小學教師專業學習社群的分布式領導、社群認同與社群投入之探究。逢甲大學公共政策所碩士論文,未出版,臺中市。
林曉甄(2010)。彰化縣國民小學教師知覺校長領導行為與學校創新經營關係之研究。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義市。
邱如美(譯) (2002)。領導人的變革法則(原作者:John P. Kotter)。臺北市:天下文化。
邱春堂(2010)。國民小學校長社會資本、教導型領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究。國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北市。new window
邱哲民(2009)。組織氣候、溝通媒介對溝通滿足及組織承諾之影響-以某公司生產型專案計畫為例。東海大學企業管理學系碩士論文,未出版,臺中市。
邱皓政(2004)。結構方程式:LISREL的理論、技術與應用。臺北市,雙葉。
邱馨儀(1995)。國民小學學校組織文化與教師組織承諾關係之研究。臺北市師範學院初等教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
凃景閔(2011)。國民小學分布式領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究。逢甲大學公共政策所碩士論文,未出版,臺中市。
姜定宇、鄭伯壎(2003)。組織忠誠、組織承諾及組織公民行為。載於姜定宇、鄭伯壎、鄭弘岳(主編),組織行為研究在臺灣(頁115-152)。臺北市:五南。new window
施碧珍(2002)。國民小學教師組織承諾量表發展之驗證性研究。國立臺北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
胡瓊泰(1999)。工作生活品質、組織承諾與組織公民行為之相關性研究─以高科技產業為例。國立中山大學人力資源管理所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
范熾文((2002)。國民小學校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校組織績效之研究。國立師範教育大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,臺北市。new window
范熾文(2007)。教師組織承諾:概念、發展、類別及其啟示。學校行政雙月刊,50,128-144。
徐宗盛(2010)。校長真誠領導與教師組織承諾、組織公民行為關係之研究。國立政治大學學校行政碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版,臺中市。
徐易男(2009)。國民小學公共關係、組織創新經營與學校效能關係之研究。國立政治大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,臺北市。new window
徐瑞霞(2006)。臺北縣國民小學校長領導行為與學校創新經營之研究。國立臺北教育大學教育學院教育政策與管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
秦夢群(2000)。教育行政:理論部分(二版)。臺北市:五南。
秦夢群(2010)。教育領導理論與應用。臺北市:五南。
秦夢群、吳勁甫(2006)。國中校長轉型領導、學校組織健康與教師組織承諾關係之研究。教育研究集刊,52(3),141-172。new window
秦夢群、濮世緯(2006)。學校創新經營理念與實施之研究。教育研究與發展期刊,2(3),123-150。new window
馬明、于學友(2008)。從分布式領導看我國學校組織領導變革。當代教育論壇,2008(2),24-26。
高淑真(2008)。臺北縣國民小學校長領導取向與學校創新經營效能關係之研究。國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
崔念祖(2011)。國民小學教師組織公民行為與學校創新經營關係之研究---以學習型學校為調節變項。國立臺南大學教育經營與管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺南市。new window
張秀玲(2001)。高屏地區學前教育教師生涯承諾及其相關因素之研究。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東縣。
張明輝(2002)。學校經營與管理研究:前瞻、整合、學習與革新。臺北市:學富文化。
張明輝(2005)。永續領導與學校經營。臺灣教育,635,8-12。
張奕華(2009)。分散式領導、教師學術樂觀與學生學習成就關係之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(NSC 98-2410-H-004-011)。臺北市:國立政治大學教育學系。
張美齡(2008)。高雄市國小校長知識管理策略與教師組織承諾關係之研究。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東縣。
張哲源(2008)。國小校長多元領導策略與學校創新經營關係之研究。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東縣。
張祝芬(2009)。高中課程領導之研究:分佈式領導取向。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,臺北市。new window
張惠英(2002)。國民小學教師工作價值觀、工作生活品質與組織承諾關係之研究。屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東縣。
張菁媛(2009)。屏東縣國小校長授能作為、教師組織承諾與學校校能關係之研究。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東縣。
張雅甄(2009)。臺中市國民小學應用知識管理於學校創新經營之研究。國立臺中教育大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,臺中市。
張新堂(2006)。高級中學知識管理、教師專業成長需求、與組織承諾關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北市。new window
張德銳(2008)。以校長評鑑提昇辦學品質-談校長評鑑的目的、規準與程序。教師天地,96,14-30。
張慶勳(1996)。國小校長轉化、互易領導影響學校組織文化特性與組織效能之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,高雄市。new window
教育部(2002)。創造力教育政策白皮書。臺北市:教育部
許陣興(2011)。高級職業學校校長知識領導、學校文化對學校創新經營效能影響之研究。國立臺北教育大學教育經營與管理學系博士論文,未出版,臺北市。new window
郭芝穎(2008)。臺北市國民小學校長願景領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
郭維哲、方聰安(2006)。學校組織公平對教師組織公民行為之研究-以信任及承諾為中介變項。教育經營與管理研究集刊,2,145-179。new window
陳怡卉(2010)。國民中學校長分散式領導與學校教育成效關係之研究。國立政治大學教育行政與政策研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
陳怡君(2001)。職業學校校長領導行為與教師組織承諾關係之研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育學系碩士論文,未出版,彰化市。
陳品瑜(2006)。臺北市國民小學專任行政組長工作滿意與組織承諾相關之研究。國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
陳建銘(2009)。國民小學校長策略領導、組織學習與學校創新經營效能關係之研究。國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北市。new window
陳柏楓(2006)。用結構方程式探討領導型態、組織文化、組織學習、工作滿足、組織承諾以及組織績效之關係-以臺灣地區人壽保險業為例。國立東華大學企業管理研究所,碩士論文,未出版,花蓮市。
陳珮琦(2003)。國民小學教師生涯發展狀況與組織承諾關係之研究。臺中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺中市。
陳國清(2011)。宜蘭縣國民小學校長分布式領導與學校效能關係之研究。國立臺北教育大學教育經營與管理學系,碩士論文。
陳滄智(2006)。臺北市國民小學教育人員組織承諾與學校效能相關之研究。國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
陳寬裕、王正華(2011)。論文統計分析實務-Spss與Amos的運用。臺北市:五南。
陳靜怡(2000)。組織行為。臺北市:臺灣西書出版社。
彭添星(2011)。國民中學校長知識領導、教師組織承諾與學校創新經營效能關係之研究。國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北市。new window
湯志民(2006)。政大附中創新經營的理念與策略。教育研究月刊,145,59-72。new window
馮清皇(2002)。創新管理在國民小學校務經營的意涵。教師天地,177,32-42。
黃乃熒、劉約蘭、曹芳齡、黃耀輝、張靜瑩譯(2008)。B. Davies編。學校領導新潮(The Essentials of School Leadership)。臺北市:華藤文化。
黃宗顯、陳麗玉、徐吉春、劉財坤、鄭明宗、劉峰銘、郭維哲、黃建皓、商永齡(2008)。學校領導新理論與實踐。臺北市:五南。
黃怡真(2008)。臺北縣市國民小學校長僕人領導行為與學校創新經營之研究。臺北市立教育大學教育行政與評鑑研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
黃芳銘(2007)。結構方程模式:理論與應用。臺北:五南。
黃建翔(2007)。學校創新經營與學校效能之相關研究。國立花蓮教育大學行政與領導研究所碩士論文,未出版,花蓮縣。
黃秋鑾(2009)。臺灣地區國民中學校長知識領導、學習社群與學校創新經營效能關係之研究。國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北市。new window
黃海山(2008)。臺南縣市國民小學智慧資本與學校創新經營關係之研究。國立臺南大學教育經營與管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺南市。
黃國隆(1986)。中學教師的組織承諾與專業承諾之研究。國立政治大學學報,53,55-84。
黃雅琪(2007)。國民小學校長教學領導與學校創新經營關係之研究-以桃竹苗四縣市為例。國立新竹教育大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
黃裕敏(2003)。國民小學學校組織文化與教師組織承諾、工作滿意關係之研究。臺東師範學院教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺東市。
黃鼎強(2011)。高雄市國民中學校長分布式領導與學校效能之相關研究。臺北市立教育大學教育行政與評鑑研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
黃韻如(2008)。臺北縣國民小學教師組織承諾與學校創新經營關係之研究。國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
黃懿嬌(2007)。臺北縣國民小學校長轉型領導行為與學校創新經營關係之研究。國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
楊文達(2007)。臺北縣國民小學創新經營與學校效能之研究。臺北市立教育大學教育行政與評鑑研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
楊振昇(2005)。教育組織變革與學校發展研究。臺北市:五南。new window
楊嘉玲(2008)。臺北市國民小學創新經營與學校效能之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
溫福星、邱皓政(2009)。組織研究中的多層次調節式中介效果:以組織創新氣氛、組織承諾與工作滿意的實證研究為例。管理學報,26(2),189-211。new window
葉佳文(2007)。臺灣地區公立高中校長教學領導、教師組織承諾與教師教學效能關係之研究。國立政治大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,臺北市。new window
詹益鉅(2001)。桃園縣國民小學校長轉型領導行為、學校建設性文化與教師組織承諾關係之研究。國立臺北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
詹萬廷(2002)。彰化縣國民小學校長行政決定方式對教師組織承諾影響之研究。國立臺中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺中市。
廖雅蘭(2011)。國民中學分布式領導與學校組織健康關係之研究。逢甲大學公共政策所碩士論文,未出版,臺中市。
劉文章(2010)。臺北縣國民小學分散式領導對教師學術樂觀影響之研究。國立政治大學學校行政碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
劉志鵬(1995)。國民小學教師參與決定、組織承諾與組織效能關係之研究。國立新竹師範學院初等教育學系碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。new window
劉春榮(1993)。國民小學組織結構、組織承諾與學校組織效能關係研究。未出版博士論文,國立政治大學教育研究所,臺北市。new window
劉瑞珠(2010)。新竹縣、市國民小學分布式領導與教師組織公民行為關係之研究。國立新竹教育大學教育行政碩士班碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
潘慧玲(2006)。教育效能與教育革新。載於謝文全(主編),教育行政學-理論與案例,471-495。臺北市:五南。
蔡政道(2010)。國民小學校長科技領導、組織文化與學校創新經營效能關係之研究。國立臺北教育大學教育學院教育政策與管理研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北市。new window
蔡純姿(2005)。學校經營創新模式與衡量指標建構之研究。國立臺南大學教育經營與管理研究所博士論文,未出版,臺南市。new window
蔡進雄(1993)。國民中學校長領導方式與教師組織承諾關係之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。new window
鄭燕祥(2001)。學校效能及校本管理發展的機制。臺北市:心理。new window
蕭勝文(2010)。臺北縣國民小學校長領導信任與教師組織承諾關係之研究。國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
賴志峰(2008)。分布式領導理論之探究—學校領導者、追隨者和情境的交互作用。國民教育研究學報,20,87-113。new window
賴志峰(2009a)。中小學分布式領導風格量表之驗證。初等教育學刊,34,25-52。
賴志峰(2009b)。教師領導的理論及實踐之探析。教育研究與發展期刊,5(3),113-143。new window
賴志峰(2010)。分布式領導的研究成果分析。教育研究月刊,201,75-86。new window
賴協志(2008)。國民小學校長知識領導、組織學習與學校效能關係之研究。臺北市立教育大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,臺北市。new window
薛德永(2008)。澎湖縣國民小學推動特色學校發展之研究。國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
謝文全(1985)。教育行政-理論與實務。臺北市:文景。
謝宜倩(2002)。國民小學教師對學校人力資源管理之執行成效與知覺及其組織承諾關係之研究。國立臺北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
謝傳崇(2007)。以平衡計分卡理念建構國民中小學創新經營效能指標之研究。國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北市。new window
謝傳崇、蕭輝勳(2011)。國民中小學校長知識領導與學校創新經營效能關係之研究。中等教育,62(1),50-70。new window
謝傳崇譯(2009)。C. Day &; K. Keithwood編。變革時代卓越的校長領導國際觀點(Successful Principal Leadership in Times of Change: An International Perspective)。臺北市:心理。
簡正一(2010)。國民小學教師知識管理、教師組織公民行為與學校創新經營效能之關係研究。國立政治大學教育學院學校行政碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
簡志明(2010)。學校分佈式領導與教師工作滿意度關係之研究:以臺北縣國小為例。臺北市立教育大學教育行政與評鑑研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
顏秀如、張明輝(2005)。學校創新經營的意涵與實施計畫。中等教育,56(3),28-52。new window
貳、西文部分
Alexander, K. T. (1996). Conceptualizing and measuring commitment to high school teaching. The Journal of Educational Research, 89(5), 295-304.
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123-167.
Anderson, J. C., &; Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach, Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423
Arbuckle, J. L. (2010). IBM SPSS amos 19 user's guide. Chicago: SPSS.
Bagozzi, R. P., &; Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Academic of Marketing Science, 16, 76-94.
Bakhurst, D. (2009). Reflection on activity theory. Educational Review, 61(2), 197-210.
Baron, R. M., &; Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
Barry, D. (1991). Managing the bossless team: Lessons in distributed leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 20(1), 31-47.
Barth, R. S. (1990). Improving schools from within. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bateman, T. S., &; Strasser, S. (1984). A longitudinal analysis of the antecedents of organizational commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), 95-112.
Bauer, S. C., Haydel, J., &; Cody, C. (2003, November). Cultivating teacher leadership for school improvement. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Biloxi, MS. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 482519). Retrieved October, 30, 2011, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/1b/8f/15.pdf
Becker, H. S. (1960). Notes on the concept of commitment. The American Journal of Sociology, 66(10), 32-40.
Bennett, N., Wise, C., Woods, P., &; Harvey, J. (2003). Distributed leadership: Summary report. Retrieved March 1, 2011, from http://www.nationalcollege.org.uk/download?id=17153&;filename=distributed-leadership-summary.pdf
Bentler, P. M., &; Wu, E. J. C. (1993). EQS for windows user's guide. Encino, CA.: Mulitvariate Software Inc.
Bishop, L. R. (1994). Exemplary schools: A focus on visionary leadership and teacher empowerment. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Houston, Texas.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent wariables (Vol. ). New York: John Wiley &; Sons, Inc.
Bradford, D. L., &; Cohen, A. R. (1998). Power up: Transforming organization through shared leadership. New York: John Wiley &; Sons.
Browne, M. (1984). Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37(1), 62-83.
Bryman, A. (1992). Charisma and leadership in organizations. London: Sage.
Buchanan, B. (1974). Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, 533-546.
Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with amos: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Campbell, J. P. (1977). On the natural of organizational effectiveness. In P. Goodman &; J. M. Pennings (Eds.), New perspectives on organizational effectiveness (pp. 13-55), Jossey-bass, San Francisco, CA.
Cevat, C. (2002). Teacher’s organization commitment in educational organizations. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 452179)
Chamberland, L. (2009). Distributed leadership: Developing a new practice. An action research study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Chen, M. H. (2004). A Study to improve organizational performance: A view from SHRM. Journal of American Academy of Business, 4(1/2), 289-291.
Cheng, Y. C. (1996). School effectiveness and school-based management: A mechanism for development. Hong Kong, China: Graphicraft Typesetters
Cheung, G. W., &; Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modelling, 9(2), 233-255.
Chiu, S. F., &; Chen, H. L. (2005). Relationship between job characteristics and organizational citizenship behavior: The meditational role of job satisfaction. Social Behavior and Personality, 33(6), 523-540.
Clugton, M. (2000). The mediating effects of multidimensional commitment on job satisfaction and intent to leave. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 477-486.
Codianni, A. V., &; Wilbur, G. (1983). More effective schooling from research to practice. New York: Clearing House and Urban Education.
Cohen, A. (1993). Multiple commitments in the workplace: An integrative approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Coleman, D. (2000). The new leaders: Transforming the art of leadership into the science of results. London: Little Brown.
Copland, M. A. (2001). The myth of the super-principal. Phi Delta Kappan, 82, 528-533.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
Cudeck, R., &; Browne, M. W. (1983). Cross-validation of covariance sStructures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 147-167.
Damanpour, F. (1991). Organization innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590.
Davis, K. (1977). Organizational behavior: Human behavior at work. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
Davis, M. W. (2009). Distributed leadership and school performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The George Washington University, Washington, DC.
Day, C., Harris, A., Hadfield, M., Toley, H., &; Beresford, J. (2000). Leading schools in times of change. Buckingham: Open University.
Diamantopoulos, A., &; Siguaw, J. A. (2000). Introducing LISREL: A guide for the uninitiated. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dramstad, S. A. (2004). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment among teachers in Norway: A comparative study of selected schools from public and private educational systems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of Michigan, Michigan.
Elenkov, D. S. (2001). Effects of leadership on organizational performance in Russian companies. Journal of Business Research, 55(6), 467-480.
Elliot, J. E. (2000). Managing technological innovation. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley &; Sons.
Elmore, R. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership. American Educator, 23(4), 6-13.
Ferris, K. R., &; Aranya, N. (1983). A comparison of two organizational commitment scales. Personnel psychology, 36, 87-98.
Firestone, W. A., &; Pennell, J. R. (1993). Teacher commitment, working condition, and differential incentive policies. Review of Educational Research, 63(4), 484-526.
Fornell, C., &; Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Gibb, J. R., Platts, G. N., &; Miller, l. F. (1951). Dynamic of participative groups. St. Louis, MO: John S. Swift.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Glasman, N. S., &; Glasman, L. D. (1997). Connecting the preparation of school leaders to the practice of school leadership. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(2), 3-20.
Goleman, D. (2002). The new leaders: Transforming the art of leadership into science of results. London: Little Brown.
Gonzalez-Roma, V., Peiro, M. J., &; Tordera, N. (2002). An examination of the antecedents and moderator influences of climate strength, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 465-473.
Gordon, Z.V. (2005). The effect of distributed leadership on student achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of Central Connecticut, New Britain, CT.
Griffin, G. A. (1995). Influences of shared decision-making on school and classroom activity: conversations with five teachers’. Elementary School Journal, 96(1), 29-45.
Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed properties: A new architect for leadership. Educational Management and Administration, 28(3), 317-338.
Gronn, P. (2003). The new work of educational leader: Changing leadership practice in an era of school reform. London: Paul Chapman.
Gronn, P. (2006). The significance of distributed leadership. Retrieved Oct 5, 2009, from http://www.slc.educ.ubc.ca/eJournal/Issue7/Articles/DistributedLeadership_%20Peter%20Gronn.pdf
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., &; Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., &; Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Hargreaves, A., &; Fink, D. (2006). Sustainable leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Harris, A. (2002). School improvement: What’s in it for school? London: Falmer Press.
Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership as distributed leadership: Heresy, fantasy or possibility. School Leadership &; Management, 23(3), 313-324.
Harris, A. (2004). Distributed leadership and school improvement. Educational Management Administration &; Leadership, 32(1), 11-24.
Harris, A. (2005). Distributed leadership. In B. Davies (Ed.), The essentials of school leadership (pp. 160-172). London: Paul Chapman.
Harris, A. (2008). Distributed leadership: According to the evidence. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 172-188.
Harris, A. (2009). Future leadership: Challenges and implication. Retrieved Oct 25, 2010 from
http://www. Almaharris.Co.uk/files/DLsf_paper.doc
Harris, A., &; Chapman, C. (2002). Democratic leadership for school improvement in challenging contexts. Retrieved Oct 18, 2010 from http://www.ucalgary.ca/~iejjll/volume6/harris.html
Harris, A., &; Muijs, D. (2005). Improving Schools through teacher leadership. Buckingham: Open University.
Harris, A., &; Spillane, J. (2008). Distributed leadership through the looking glass. Management in Education, 22(1), 31-34.
Harrison, N. L. T. (2005). The impact of distributed leadership on teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
Hatcher, R. (2004). Distributed leadership and managerial power in schools. Retrieved September 5, 2010, from http://www.soc-for-ed-studies.org.uk/pdfs/hatcher.pdf
Hatton, S. A. (1997). Teacher organizational commitment in high performing, low socioeconomic status, border elementary schools. DAI-A 58/01, 42.
Hay Group. (2004). The five pillars of distributed leadership in schools. Nottingham, UK: National College for School Leadership.
Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408-420.
Hoogland, J. J., &; Boomsma, A. (1998). Robustness studies in covariance structure modeling: An overview and a meta-analysis. Sociological Methods &; Research, 26, 327-367.
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., &; Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.
Hopkins, T. G., &; West (1994). Organization development and change. NY: Minni West.
Howell, J. M., &; Frost, P. J. (1989). A laboratory study of charismatic leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43(2), 243-269.
Hulpia, H., Devos, G., &; Keer, H. (2010).The influence of distributed leadership on teachers’ organizational commitment: A multilevel approach. The Journal of Educational Research, 103, 40-52.
Hulpia, H., Devos, G., &; Rosseel, Y. (2009). The relationship between the perception of distributed leadership in secondary schools and teachers’ and teacher leaders’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20(3), 291-317.
IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 19). (2010). Armonk, New York: IBM Corp.
Jaimes, I. J. (2009). Distributed leadership practices in schools: Effect on the development of teacher leadership. A case study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Jöreskog, K. G. (1993). Testing structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen &; J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Jöreskog, K. G., &; Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8 user's reference guide. Mooresville Scientific Software, INC.
Kadyschuk, R. (1998). Teachers’ commitment: A study of organizational commitment, professional commitment, union commitment of teacher in public school in Saskatchewan. DAI-A 58/12, P. 4510.
Kalleberg, A. L. (1977). Work value and job rewards: A theory of job satisfaction. American Sociology Review, 42, 124-143.
Karsh, B., Booske, B. C., &; Sainfort, F. (2005). Job and organizational determinants of nursing home employee commitment, job satisfaction and intent to turnover. Ergonomocs, 48(10), 1260-1281.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and Practice of structural equation modeling (2 ed.): New York: Guilford.
Kushman, J. W. (1992). The organizational dynamics of teacher workplace commitment: A study of urban elementary and middle school. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(1), 5-42.
Kutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 17- 44). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Lambert, L. (1998). Building leadership capacity in school. Alexandria, VA:
Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Leech, N. L., Barrett, K. C., &; Morgan, G. A. (2005). SPSS for intermediate statistics: Use and interpretation (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Levine, L. U., &; Lezotte, L. L. (1990). Unusually effective school: A review and analysis of research and practice. Madison, WI: National Center for Effective School Research and Development.
Lewis, P., &; Murphy, R. (2008). New directions in school leadership. School Leadership &; Management, 28(2), 127-146.
Lieberman, A., Saxl, E. R., &; Miles, M. B. (1998). Teacher leadership: Ideology and practice. In A. Liberman (Ed.), Building a professional culture in schools (pp. 148-166). New York: Teachers College Press.
Little, J. W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional relations. Teachers College Record, 91, 509-536.
Little, T. D. (1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-culture data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(1), 53-76.
Lloyd, S. (2005). Distributed leadership: The rhetoric and the reality. Retrieved October 15, 2010, From http://www.ncsl.org.uk/media/757/7D/randd-prac-award-lloyd-distributed-leadership.pdf
Louis, K. S., &; Murphy, J. (1994). The evolving role of the principal. In J. Murphy &; K. S. Louis (Eds.), Reshaping the principalship: Insights from transformational reform efforts (pp. 265-281). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Lynch, O. (2009). Generative leadership: A case study of distributed leadership and leadership sustainability at two New York city high schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Mills College, Oakland, California.
MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mathieu, J. E., &; Zajack. D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171-194.
McDonald, R. P., &; Ho, M. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analysis. Psychological Methods, 7, 64-82.
Meyer, J. P., &; Herscovitch, L. (2001). Commitment in the workplace: Toward a general model. Human Resource Management Review, 11, 299-326.
Meyer, J. P., &; Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. London: Sage.
Meyer, J. P., &; Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., &; Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates and consequences. Journal of vocational behavior, 61, 20-52.
Meyer, J. P., Paunonen, S. V., Gellatly, I. R., Goffin, R. D., &; Jackson, D. N. (1989). Organizational commitment and job performance: It’s the nature of the commitment that counts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(1), 152-156.
MIT Leadership Center Web. (2007). Distributed leadership model. Retrieved Oct 3, 2010 from http://sloanleadership.mit.edu/r-dlm.php
Morris, J. H., &; Sherman, J. D. (1981). Generalizability of organizational commitment model, Academy of Management Journal, 24(3), 512-526.
Morrow, P. C. (1993). The theory and measurement of work commitment. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Mowday, R., Steers, R., &; Porter, L. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 22-54.
Mowday, R. T., Porter, L.W., &; Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee organization linkage. New York: Academic Press.
Muijs, D., &; Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership - improvement through empowerment? An overview of the literature. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 31(4), 437-448.
Murphy, J. (2006). Connecting teaching leadership and school improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Murphy, J., Smylie, M. A., Mayrowetz, D., &; Louis. K. S. (2009). The role of principal in fostering the development of distributed leadership. School Leadership and management, 29(2), 181-214.
National College for School Leadership (2004). Distributed leadership action pack. Retrieved February 16, 2011, from http://www.nationalcollege.org.uk/distributed-leadership-action-pack.pdf
O'Reilly, C. A., &; Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychology attachment: The effect of compliance, identification and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 3, 492-499.
Parker, R. J., &; Kohlmeyer Ⅲ, J. M. (2005). Organizational justice and turnover in public accounting firms: A research note. Accounting, organizations and society, 30, 357-369.
Ping Jr., R. A. (2004). On assuring valid measures for theoretical models using survey data. Journal of Business Research, 57, 125-141.
Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., &; Boulian, P. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5), 603-609.
Purkey, S. C., &; Smith, M. S. (1983). School reform: A review. Elementary School Journal, 83, 427-452.
Rajek, B. (1997). Designing and implementing value focused effectiveness indicators. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED409957).
Randall, D. M. (1987). Commitment and the organization: The organization man revisited. Academy of Management Review, 12(3), 460-471.
Rashid, M. Z. A., Sambasivan, M., &; Johari, J. (2003). The influence of corporate culture and organizational commitment on performance. Journal of Management Development, 22(8), 708-728.
Reyes, P. (Ed). (1990). Teachers and their workplace: Commitment, performance and productivity. Newbury, Park: California Sage Publications.
Reyes, P., &; Pounder, D. G. (1990). Teacher commitment, job satisfaction, and school value orientation: A study of public and private schools. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Rich, J. M. (1992). Innovations in education: Reformers and their critics (6th ed.). Boston : Allyn and Bacon.
Rinehart, J. S., &; Short, P. M. (1994). Job satisfaction and empowerment among teacher leaders, reading recovery teachers and regular classroom teachers. Education, 114, 570-580.
Ritchie, R., &; Woods, P. A. (2007). Degrees of distribution: Towards an understanding of variations in the nature of distributed leadership in schools. School Leadership &; Management, 27(4), 363-381.
Robbins, S. P. (2001). Organizational behavior: Concepts, controversies and applications (9th ed.). Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Robinson, V. M. J. (2008). Forging the links between distributed leadership and educational outcomes. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 241-256.
Rosenhole, S. (1998). Teachers’ workplace: The social organization of schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
Schmidt, K. H. (2007). Organizational commitment: A further moderator in the relationship between work stress and strain? International Journal of Stress Management, 14, 26-40.
Schumacker, R. E., &; Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schumacker, R. E., &; Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Senge, P. (1990).The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
Sheldon, M. E. (1971). Investments and involvements in mechanisms producing commitment to the organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 142-150.
Smylie, M. A., Conley, S., &; Marks, H. M. (2002). Exploring new approaches to teacher leadership for school improvement. In J. Murphy (Ed.), The educational leadership challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st Century (pp. 162-188). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education Press.
Smylie, M. A., Mayrowetz, D., Murphy, J., &; Louis. K. S. (2007). Trust and the development of distributed leadership. Journal of School Ledaership, 17(2), 469-503.
Sobel, M. E. (1986). Some new results on indirect effects and their standard errors in covariance structure models. In N. Tuma (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 159-186). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
Soler, C. H. (2000). The relationship of organizational structure and job characteristics to teacher's job satisfaction and commitment. DAI-A 61/06, p.2136.
Somech, A., &; Drach-Zahavy, A. (2000). Understanding extra-role behavior in schools: The relationships between jobs satisfaction, sense of officially, and teachers, extra role behavior. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 649-659.
Spillane, J. P. (2003). Educational leadership. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 343-346
Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Spillane, J. P., &; Diamond, J. B. (2007). Distributed leadership in practice. New York: Columbia University Press.
Spillane, J. P., Camburn, E. M., &; Pareja, A. S. (2007). Taking a distributed perspective to the school principal's workday. Leadership and Policy in schools, 6(1), 103-125.
Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., &; Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23-28.
Staw, B. M. (1981). The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Management Review, 6, p577.
Steer, R. M. (1977). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 47-72.
Stevens, J. M., Beyer, J., &; Trice, H. M. (1978). Assessing personal, role, and organizational predictiors of managerial commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 21, 382-405.
Stoll, L., &; Fink, D. (1993). Effecting school change: the halton approach School. Effectiveness and School Improvement, 3(1), 19-41.
Stone, C. A. and Sobel, M. E. (1990). The robustness of estimates of total indirect effects in covariance structure models estimated by maximum likelihood, Psychometrika, 55, 337-352.
Teaslev, T. E. (2006). Principals as strategists: Distributed leadership for
instructional improvement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Massachusetts.
Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DL American Psychological Association.
Timperley, H. S. (2009). Distributed leadership and students. In K. Leithwood, B. Mascall, &; T. Strauss (Eds.), Distributed leadership according to the evidence (pp.197-222). New York: Routledge Press.
Torkzadeh, G., Koufteros, X., &; Pflughoeft, K. (2003). Confirmatory Analysis of Computer Self-Efficacy. Structural Equation Modelling, 10(2), 263-275.
Van Scotter, J. R. (2000). Relationships of task performance and contextual performance with turnover, job satisfaction, and affective commitment, Human Resource Management Review, 10(1), 79-95.
West, S. G., Finch, J. F., &; Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.) Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc.
Wheatley, M. (1999). Leadership and the new science: Discovering order in a chaotic world (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
Wiener, Y. (1982).Commitment in organizations: A normative view. Academy of Management Review, 7(3), 420-445.
Wolfendale, S .(2000). Assessing special educational needs. NY: Cassell.
Woods, P. A., Bennett, N., Harvey, J. A., &; Wise, C. (2004). Variabilities and dualities in distributed leadership: findings from a systematic literature review. Educational Management Administration &; Leadership, 32(4), 439-457.
Young D. J. (1998). Characteristics of effective rural schools. A longitudinal study of western Australian high school students. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED 422151).
Yukl, G. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weakness in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 285-305.


 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE