壹、中文部分
丁福慶(2004)。國民小學學校組織文化與學校效能之研究—以雲嘉地區為例。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義市。
丁潤生(2002)。管理之道—易經太極管理思維學。台北縣:頂淵。
王如哲(2003)。英美學校效能研究的回顧與啟示。臺灣教育,619,14-20。
王博弘、林清達(2006)。台灣近二十年來校長領導實徵研究與學校效能關係之探討。花蓮教育大學學報,22,283-306。任金剛、黃國隆、鄭伯壎(2001)。組織文化與組織氣候。載於鄭伯壎、郭建志、任金剛(主編),組織文化:員工層次的分析(頁63-167)。台北市:遠流。成中英(1995)。C理論:易經管理哲學。台北市:東大。
江岷欽(1989)。組織文化研究途徑之分析。行政學報,21,65-92。江岷欽(1993)。組織分析。台北市:五南。
江岷欽(1994)。競值途徑在組織研究之應用。中國行政,55,29-66。江滿堂(2008)。國民小學校長多元領導型態、團體動力、學校組織文化特質與學校效能關係之研究。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所博士論文,未出版,屏東縣。江澈(2007)。私立高級中學校長競值領導、教師專業承諾、組織創新與組織效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所博士論文,未出版,高雄市。
余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式:SIMPLIS的應用。台北市:高等教育。
吳勁甫(2003a)。校長領導與學校效能關係之探討—研究結果的回顧。學校行政雙月刊,27,52-62。
吳勁甫(2003b)。競值架構應用在國民小學校長領導行為與學校組織效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。吳勁甫(2005)。學校競值組織效能量表之發展。初等教育學刊,22,39-62。吳勁甫(2007)。競值架構應用在國民小學校長領導行為之衡量。學校行政雙月刊,52,163-192。吳政達(2002)。教育政策分析:概念、方法與應用。台北市:高等教育。
吳政達(2007)。教育政策分析新論。台北市:高等教育。
吳清山(1998)。學校效能研究(第二版)。台北市:五南。吳清山(2003)。學校效能研究:理念與應用。臺灣教育,619,2-13。吳清山(2004)。學校行政(第六版)。台北市:心理。
吳清山(2005)。學校效能研究的價值。教育研究集刊,51(2),133-139。吳齊殷(譯)(1999)。R. F. DeVellis著。量表發展:理論與應用(Scale Development: Theory and Application)。台北市:弘智文化。
吳璧如(2002)。組織文化與組織氣候理論。載於張銀富(主編),學校行政—理論與應用(頁117-164)。台北市:五南。
吳瓊恩(2005)。行政學的範圍與方法。台北市:五南。
呂金河(編譯)(2005)。S. Sharma著。多變量分析(Applied Multivariate Techniques)。台中市:滄海。
李仁豪(2007)。多層次結構方程式模型在大型資料庫上的運用。國立政治大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,台北市。李永吟、張新仁、潘慧玲、許殷宏(1998)。國民小學學校效能縱貫研究。教育研究資訊,6(3),1-25。李志鴻、劉兆明、郭建志、邱皓政、王思峰(2006)。組織文化的研究反思。載於鄭伯勳、姜定宇(編著),華人組織行為:議題、作法及出版(頁296-323)。台北市:華泰。李新民、陳密桃(2007)。組織公民行為的因素結構與影響因素:巢狀結構與階層線性模式的分析。高雄師大學報:教育與社會科學類,22,69-91。李翠萍(1992)。組織文化與組織效能之研究:競值途徑之應用。私立東海大學公共行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,台中市。
李懿芳、江芳盛(2008)。有效的學校領導對數學學習成就之影響:以TIMSS 2003台灣調查資料為例。教育政策論壇,11(2),107-130。周東山(1995)。Some new ways of analyzing MANOVA data in a post hoc context。測驗統計年刊,3,237-265。
林志成(1997)。陰陽權變組織文化理論之初步建構—以我國國民小學為例。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,台北市。林志成(2000)。多元派典的教育行政領導研究與實務。初等教育學報,7,1-26。
林明地(2000)。校長領導的影響:近三十年來研究結果的分析。國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學,10(2),232-254。
林明地(2002)。學校領導:理念與校長專業生涯。台北市:高等教育。
林明地(2006)。中庸式動態平衡的學校領導:理念初探。研習資訊,23(6),19-24。
林明地(譯)(1998)。T. E. Deal & K. D. Peterson著。學校領導:平衡邏輯與藝術(The Leadership Paradox: Balancing Logic and Artistry in Schools)。台北市:五南。
林信榕(2007)。校長領導與學校文化探究。台北市:師大書苑。林俊瑩、吳裕益(2007)。家庭因素、學校因素對學生學業成就的影響—階層線性模式的分析。教育研究集刊,53(4),107-144。林清山(2000)。多變項分析統計法(第五版)。台北市:東華。
林淑芬(2001)。競值架構在國中校長領導行為及學校組織文化應用之研究。國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,南投縣。
林鉦棽(2005)。組織公民行為之跨層次分析:層級線性模式的應用。管理學報,22(4),503-524。林鉦棽、彭台光(2006)。多層次管理研究:分析層次的概念、理念和方法。管理學報,23(6),649-675。
林耀堂(2004)。思維模式在學校組織弔詭領導的應用—以阿多諾的「非同一性思維」深化並提昇「競值途徑」為例。國立台北師範學院學報,17(2),131-152。邵愛國(2003)。中庸之道的管理智慧及其現代價值。蘇州大學應用心理學專業碩士論文,未出版,蘇州市。
邱皓政(2003)。結構方程模式:LISREL的理論、技術與應用。台北市:雙葉書廊。
邱皓政(2005)。量化研究法(二):統計原理與分析技術。台北市:雙葉書廊。
邱皓政(2006)。量化研究與統計分析—SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析(第三版)。台北市:五南。
邱皓政(2007)。脈絡變數的多層次潛在變數模式分析:口試評分者效應的多層次結構方程模式應用。中華心理學刊,49(4),383-405。邱皓政、溫福星(2007)。脈絡效果的階層線性模型:以學校組織創新氣氛與教師創意表現為例。教育與心理研究,30(1),1-35。侯杰泰、溫忠麟、成子娟(2004)。結構方程模型及其應用。北京市:教育科學。
柳恒超、許燕、王力(2007)。結構方程模型應用中模型選擇的原理和方法。心理學探新,27(101),758-78。
孫瑞霙(2002)。競值架構下領導型態、組織文化與組織效能之研究-以台灣地區技術學院為例。國立台北大學企業管理學系博士論文,未出版,台北市。孫瑞霙(2004)。技職院校組織文化現況之探討。中國技術學院學報,26,99-113。
徐長江、時勘(2003)。領導者—組織文化匹配模式的研究構思。管理評論,15(7),45-50。
徐長江、時勘(2005)。變革型領導與交易型領導的權變分析。心理科學進展,13(5),672-678。
秦夢群(2005)。教育領導新理論與研究取向之分析。教育研究月刊,136,106-118。秦夢群(2006)。教育行政—理論部分(第五版)。台北市:五南。
秦夢群、吳勁甫、濮世緯(2007)。校長轉型、交易領導與教師工作滿意關係之後設分析。教育與心理研究,30(4),27-55。高新建(1997)。階層線性模式在內屬結構教育資料上的應用:以數學學習機會為例。國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學,7(4),597-611。高新建、吳幼吾(1997)。階層線性模式在內屬結構教育資料上的應用。教育研究資訊,5(2),31-50。張永欽(2002)。台北市立國小校長領導行為塑造學校組織文化與學校效能之研究。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
張勉、張德(2004)。組織文化測量研究述評。外國經濟與管理,26(8),2-7。
張德銳(2006)。教育行政組織。載於謝文全等著,教育行政學:理論與案例(頁217-249)。台北市:五南。
張慶勳(1996)。國小校長轉化、互易領導影響學校組織文化特性與組織效能之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,高雄市。張慶勳(2002)。學校組織行為。台北市:五南。張慶勳(2003)。學校組織文化研究方法之評析。屏東師院學報,18,1-40。許惠玲(2007)。桃園縣國小校長競值架構領導型態對教師快樂影響之研究。私立中原大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
郭建志(2003)。組織文化研究之回顧與前瞻。應用心理研究,20,83-114。陳文慶(2008)。競值架構應用在國民小學學校組織文化與學校效能關係之研究。台北市立教育大學教育行政與評鑑研究所學校行政碩士班碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵(2005)。多變量分析方法—統計軟體應用(第四版)。台北市:五南。
陳春風(2007)。高雄縣國民小學校長領導能力、組織文化與學校效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系學校行政碩士班碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
陳炳男(2005)。從Schein、Martin與Quinn等文化觀點,對學校領導者的啟示。朝陽人文社會學刊,3(2),99-130。
陳順利(2007)。學校效能階層模式建構之探究。學校行政雙月刊,49,16-44。
陳慶瑞(1986)。費德勒權變領導理論適用性之研究-以我國國民小學為例。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。陳慶瑞(1993)。費德勒權變領導理論研究-理論分析與擴展。國立政治大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,台北市。陳慧芬(1996)。國民小學組織文化之研究:一所台中市國民小學的個案分析。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,台北市。曾仕強(2006)。中道管理—M理論及其應用。北京市:北京大學出版社。
曾憲年(2005)。老子領導思想研究。長沙市:湖南師範大學出版社。
閔建蜀(2001)。易經的領導智慧。香港:中文大學出版社。
黃乃熒(2000a)。弔詭管理及其在學校目標的應用。教育政策論壇,3(2),16-56。黃乃熒(2000b)。後現代教育行政哲學。台北市:師大書苑。
黃乃熒(2001)。國民中學學校行政領導方式與學校目標弔詭管理之研究。國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學,11(1),36-60。
黃芳銘(2006)。結構方程模式:理論與應用(第四版)。台北市:五南。
黃芳銘、溫福星(2007)。模式化學習型學校:多層次驗證性因素分析取向。測驗學刊,54(1),197-222。黃開成(2006)。競值途徑模式在學校組織文化與組織效能之應用-以彰化縣國民中學為例。國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,南投縣。
黃馨慧(2006)。競值架構應用在國民小學校長領導行為與學校效能關係之研究。國立花蓮教育大學行政與領導研究所碩士論文,未出版,花蓮縣。
溫忠麟、侯杰泰、張雷(2005)。調節效應與中介效應的比較和應用。心理學報,37(2),268-274。
溫忠麟、張雷、侯杰泰(2006)。有中介的調節變量和有調節的中介變量。心理學報,38(3),448-452。
溫忠麟、張雷、侯杰泰、劉紅云(2004)。中介效應檢驗程序及其應用。心理學報,36(5),614-620。
溫福星(2006)。階層線性模式:原理、方法與應用。台北市:雙葉書廊。
葉連祺(2004)。鳥瞰教育領導理念之叢林:教育領導理念之初步綜觀。教育研究月刊,124,96-108。董治華(1990)。組織效能理論之分析架構—採價值觀點。國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
廖年淼、何信助、賴銘娟(2004)。高級職業學校組織文化與教師組織承諾關係之研究。中正教育研究,3(2),69-96。趙中建(2004)。組織文化、校園文化與學校文化。載於趙中建(主編),學校文化(頁3-29)。上海市:華東師範大學出版社。
趙志揚(2002)。學校效能研究。載於張銀富(主編),學校行政:理論與應用(頁281-324)。台北市:五南。
潘慧玲(1999a)。學校效能相關概念的釐析。教育研究資訊,7(5),138-153。潘慧玲(1999b)。學校效能研究領域的發展。教育研究集刊,43,77-102。蔡培村、武文瑛(2004)。領導學:理論、實務與研究。高雄市:麗文文化。
蔡進雄(2000a)。國民中學校長轉型領導、互易領導、學校文化與學校效能關係之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,台北市。蔡進雄(2000b)。轉型領導與學校效能。台北市:師大書苑。鄭伯壎、郭建志(2001)。組織文化與員工效能(二):契合度與強度模式。載於鄭伯壎、郭建志、任金剛(主編),組織文化:員工層次的分析(頁209-262)。台北市:遠流。鄭志宏(1992)。周易原理領導思想之探究。國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
鄭彩鳳(1996)。競值途徑應用在高中職校長領導角色、學校組織文化與組織效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,高雄市。鄭彩鳳(1998)。競值途徑應用在學校組織行為分析之研究。教育研究,6,53-68。
鄭彩鳳(2002)。學校行政—理論與實務(第三版)。高雄市:麗文文化。
鄭彩鳳(2005)。領導效能的涵義、研究途徑與發展方向。教育學苑,10,1-21。
鄭彩鳳(2006)。校長競值領導效能指標之建構與衡量。高雄市:復文。
鄭彩鳳(2007)。校長競值領導效能研究:理論、指標與衡量。台北市:高等教育。
鄭彩鳳、吳勁甫(2003)。學校領導研究的新取向—競值架構的領導觀點。教育研究月刊,111,67-83。鄭燕祥(2001)。學校效能及校本管理:發展的機制。台北市:心理。鄭燕祥(2003)。教育領導與改革:新範式。台北市:高等教育。
鄭燕祥(2006)。教育範式轉變:效能保證。台北市:高等教育。蕭佳純、胡夢鯨(2007)。影響成人教育工作者知識管理能力因素之跨層次分析。教育學刊,29,1-36。蕭佳純、董旭英(2007)。教師參與團體學習行為之跨層次分析:層級線性模式之應用。師大學報:教育類,52(3),65-89。賴鈴文(2006)。高雄縣市國民小學校長領導行為、學校組織文化與組織變革態度關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學人力與知識管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
閻瑞彥(2000)。基層領導型態與組織效能:競值途徑觀點下之研究。國立台北大學企業管理學系博士論文,未出版,台北市。濮世緯(2003)。國小校長轉型領導、學校文化取向與學校創新經營關係之研究。國立政治大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,台北市。繆敏志(1993)。組織文化之探討。國立政治大學學報,67(下),133-162。
繆敏志(2001)。從組織文化相關量化研究評析競值架構。國立政治大學學報,83,157-195。
繆敏志(2002)。環境不確定性與組織文化類型、強度、均衡性及集群關係之研究。企業管理學報,55,83-111。謝文全(2003)。教育行政學。台北市:高等教育。
羅虞村(1999)。領導理論研究。台北市:文景。
羅錦財(2001)。國民中學校長領導角色與學校組織文化競值途徑之研究---以桃國縣市為例。國立台灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
貳、英文部分
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Antonakis, J., Cianciolo. A. T., & Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Leadership: Past, present, and future. In J. Antonakis., A. T. Cianciolo., & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The nature of leadership (pp. 3-15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Antonakis, J., Schriesheim, C. A., Donovan, J. A., Gopalakrishna-Pillai, K., Pellegrini, E. K., & Rossomme, J. L. (2004). Methods for studying leadership. In J. Antonakis., A. T. Cianciolo., & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The nature of leadership (pp. 48-70). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ayman, R. (2004). Situational and contingency approaches to leadership. In J. Antonakis., A. T. Cianciolo., & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The nature of leadership (pp. 148-170). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Badaracco, J. L. (1997). Defining Moments: When mangers must choose between right and right. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Badaracco, J. L., & Ellsworth, R. R. (1989). Leadership and the quest for integrity. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications(3rd ed.). New York: The Free Press.
Belasen, A. T. (2000). Leading the learning organization: Communication and competencies for managing change. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Belasen, A. T. (2008). The theory and practice of corporate communication: A competing values perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Beretvas, S. N., & Furlow, C. F. (2006). Evaluation of an approximate method for synthesizing covariance matrices for use in meta-analytic SEM. Structural Equation Modeling, 13(2), 153-185.
Bliese, P. D. (2000).Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski(Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations(p.349-381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bobko, P., & Schwartz, J. P. (1984). A metric for integrating theoretically related but statistically uncorrelated constructs. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(1), 11-16.
Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2003). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership(3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: The Guilford Press.
Cameron, K. S. (1986). Effectiveness as paradox: Consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness. Management Science, 32(5), 539-553.
Cameron, K. S. (2005). Organizational effectiveness: Its demise and re-emergence through positive organizational scholarship. In K. G. Smith & M. A. Hitt (Eds.), Great minds in management(pp.304-330). New York: Oxford university Press.
Cameron, K. S., & Bilimoria, D. (1985). Assessing effectiveness in higher education. The Review of Higher Education, 9(1), 101-118.
Cameron, K. S., & Ettington, D. R. (1988). The conceptual foundations of organizational culture. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp.356-396). New York: Agathon Press.
Cameron, K. S., & Freeman, S. J. (1991). Cultural congruence, strength, and type: Relationships to effectiveness. In R. W. Woodman & W. A. Pasmore (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development, volume 5(pp.23-58). London: JAI Press.
Cameron, K. S., & Lavine, M. (2006). Making the impossible possible: Leading extraordinary performance—The rocky flats story. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
Cameron, K. S., & Quinn , R. E. (1988). Organizational paradox and transformation. In R. E. Quinn & K. S. Cameron (Eds.), Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management(pp.1-18). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.
Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2006). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework(Rev. ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Cameron, K. S., & Whetten, D. A. (1983). Some conclusions about organizational effectiveness. In K. S. Cameron & D. A. Whetten (Eds.), Organizational effectiveness: A comparison of multiple models (pp.261-277). New York: Academic Press.
Cameron, K. S., Quinn, R. E., DeGraff, J., & Thakor, A. (2006). Competing values leadership: Creating value in organizations . Northampton, MA: Edward-Elgar.
Cheung, M. W. L., & Au, K. (2005). Applications of multilevel structural equation modeling to cross-cultural research. Structural Equation Modeling, 12(4), 598-619.
Cheung, M. W. L., & Chan, W. (2005). Meta-analytic structural equation modeling: A two-stage approach. Psychological Methods, 10(1), 40-64.
Cheung, M. W. L., Leung, K., & Au, K. (2006). Evaluating multilevel models in cross-cultural research: An illustration with social axioms. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37(5), 522-541.
Chin, J. M. C. (2007). Meta-analysis of transformational school leadership effects on school outcomes in Taiwan and the USA. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8(2), 166-177.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences(3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cooper, R. B., & Quinn, R. E. (1993). Implications of the competing values framework for management information systems. Human Resource Management, 32(1), 175-201.
de Capitani, A. (1994). Organizational effectiveness as a socially constructed criterion: A study of the relation between culture and the meaning of organizational effectiveness in a large multinational organization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The George Washington University, Washington, D. C.
Deal, T. E., & Kennedy, A. A. (1982). Corporate cultures: The rites and rituals of corporate life. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Deal, T. E., & Peterson, K. D. (1999). Shaping school culture: The heart of leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
DeGraff, J., & Lawrence, K. A. (2002). Creativity at work: Developing the right practices to make innovation happen. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
DeGraff, J., & Quinn, S. E. (2007). Leading innovation: How to jump start your organization’s growth engine. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Denison, D. R., Hooijberg, R., & Quinn, R. E. (1995). Paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organization Science, 6(5), 524-540.
Denison, D., & Spreitzer, G. M. (1991). Organizational culture and organizational development: A competing values approach. In R. W. Woodman & W. A. Pasmore (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development, volume 5 (pp. 1-21). London: JAI Press.
Enders, C. K. (2003). Performing multivariate group comparisons following a statistically significant MANOVA. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 36(1), 40-56.
Faerman, S. R., & Quinn, R. E. (1985). Effectiveness: The perspective from organizational theory. The Review of Higher Education, 9(1), 83-100.
Furlow, C. F., & Beretvas, S. N. (2005). Meta-analytic methods of pooling correlation matrices for structural equation modeling under different patterns of missing data. Psychological Methods, 10(2), 227-254.
Goldstein, H., Bonnet, G., & Rocher, T. (2007). Multilevel structural equation models for the analysis of comparative data on educational performance. Journal of Educational Behavioral Statistics, 32(3), 252-286.
Griffith, J. (2002). Is quality/effectiveness an empirically demonstrable school attribute? Statistical aids for determining appropriate levels of analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 13(1), 91-122.
Griffith, J. (2003). School as organizational models: Implications for examining school effectiveness. The Elementary School Journal, 104(1), 29-47.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1996a). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5-44.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1996b). The principal’s role in school effectiveness: An assessment of methodological progress, 1980-1995. In K. Leithwood, J. Chapman, D. Corson, P. Hallinger, & A. Weaver-Hart(Eds.), The international handbook of educational leadership and administration(pp.723-783). New York: Kluwer.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157-191.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1999). Can leadership enhance school effectiveness? In T. Bush, L. Bell, R. Bolam, R. Glatter, & P. Ribbins (Eds.), Educational management: Redefining theory, policy and practice (pp.178-190). London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.
Hallinger, P., & Leithwood, K. (1996). Culture and educational administration: A case of finding out what you don’t know you don’t know. Journal of Educational Administration, 34(5), 98-116.
Hart, S. L., & Quinn, R. E. (1993). Roles executives play: CEOs, behavioral complexity, and firm performance . Human Relations, 46(5), 543-574.
Heck, R. H. (2000). Examining the impact of school quality on school outcomes and improvement: A value-added approach. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(4), 513-552.
Hill, P. W., & Rowe, K. J. (1996). Multilevel modelling in school effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7(1), 1-34.
Hill, P. W., & Rowe, K. J. (1998). Modelling student progress in studies of educational effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(3), 310-333.
Hofmann, D. A. (1997). An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. Journal of management, 23(6), 723-744.
Hofmann, D. A., Griffin, M. A., & Gavin, M. B. (2000). The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. In K. J. klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski(Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations(pp.467-511). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. J. (2005). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind(2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Holmbeck, G. N. (1997). Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: Examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65(4), 599-610.
Hooijberg, R. (1992). Behavioral complexity and managerial effectiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Hooijberg, R. (1996). A multidirectional approach toward leadership: An extension of the concept of behavioral complexity. Human Relations, 49(7), 917-946.
Hooijberg, R., & Petrock, F. (1993). On cultural change: Using the competing values framework to help leaders execute a transformational strategy. Human Resource Management, 32(1), 29-50.
Hooijberg, R., & Quinn, R. E. (1992). Behavioral complexity and the development of effective managers. In R. L. Phillips & J. G. Hunt (Eds.), Strategic leadership: A multiorganizational-level perspective(pp. 161-176). Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
Hooijberg, R., & Schneider, M. (2001). Behavioral complexity and social intelligence: How executive leadership use stakeholders to form a system perspective. In S. J. Zaccaro & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), The nature of organizational leadership: Understanding the performance imperatives confronting today’s leaders(pp. 104-131). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Hooijberg, R., Hunt, J. G., & Dodge, G. E. (1997). Leadership complexity and development of the leaderplex model. Journal of Management, 23(3), 375-408.
Hopwood, C. J. (2007). Moderation and mediation in structural equation modeling: Applications for early intervention research. Journal of Early Intervention,29 (3), 262-272.
Howard, L. W. (1998). Validating the competing values model as a representation of organizational cultures. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 6(3), 231-250.
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2001). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2005). Education administration:Theory, research, and practice(7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
Huberty, C. J., & Morris, J. D. (1989). Multivariate analysis versus multiple univariate analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 105(2), 302-308.
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1884). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85-98.
James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A., & Brett, J. M. (2006). A tale of two methods. Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 233-244.
Kalliath, T. J., Bluedorn, A. C., & Gillespie, D. F. (1999). Confirmatory factor analysis of the competing values instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(1), 143-158.
Kaplan, R. E., & Kaiser, R. B. (2006). The versatile leadership: Make the most of your strengths—Without overdoing it. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Kennedy, E., & Mandeville, G. (2000). Some methodological issues in school effectiveness research. In C. Teddlie & D. Reynolds (Eds.), The international handbook of school effectiveness research (pp.189-205). New York: Falmer Press.
Kim, K., Dansereau, F., Kim, I. S., & Kim, K. S. (2004). A multiple-level theory of leadership: The impact of culture as a moderator. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 11(1), 78-92.
Kwan, P., & Walker, A. (2004). Validating the competing values model as a representation of organizational culture through inter-institutional comparisons. Organizational Analysis, 12(1), 21-37.
Kyriakides, L., Campbell, R. J., & Gagatsis, A. (2000). The significance of the classroom effect in primary schools: An application of Creemers’ comprehensive model of educational effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11(4), 501-529.
Lawrence, K. A., & Quinn, R. E. (2002). An instrument for measuring behavior complexity in leadership. Unpublished working paper, University of Michigan Business School, Ann Arbor, MI.
Lawrence, K. A., Lenk, P., & Quinn, R. E. (in press). Behavioral complexity in leadership: The psychometric properties of a new instrument to measure behavioral repertoire. Leadership Quarterly.
Lawrence, K. A., Quinn, R. E., & Lenk, P. (2003). Behavioral complexity in leadership: The psychometric properties of a new instrument. Unpublished working paper, University of Michigan Business School, Ann Arbor, MI.
Lunenburg, F. C., & Ornstein, A. C. (2004). Education administration:Concepts and practices(4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83-104.
Maeyer, S. D., Rymenans, R., Petegem, P. V., Bergh, H. V. D., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2007). Educational leadership and pupil achievement: The choice of a valid conceptual model to test effects in school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 18(2), 125-145.
Martin, J. (1992). Cultures in organizations: Three perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.
Martin, J. (2002). Organizational culture: Mapping the terrain. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Martin, R. (2007). The opposable mind: How successful leaders win through integrative thinking. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Marzano, R. J., Waters, T., & McNulty, B. A. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Maslowski, R. (2001). School culture and school performance: An explorative study into the organizational culture of secondary schools and their effects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Mitroff, I. I., & Mason, R. O. (1982). Business policy and metaphysics: Some philosophical considerations. Academy of Management Review, 7(3), 361-371.
Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 852-863.
Newman, C. B. (2001). The perceptions of elementary principals regarding the relationship between leadership and school culture. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO.
Northouse, P. G. (2007). Leadership: Theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Owens, R. G., & Valesky, T. C. (2007). Organizational behavior in education: Adaptive leadership and school reform(9th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Peterson, K. D. (2005). School culture, school effectiveness, and school leadership. Chung Cheng Educational Studies, 4(s), 63-103.
Pettigrew, A. M. (1979). On studying organizational cultures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 570-581.
Pinter, N. J. (1988). The study of administrator effects and effectiveness. In N. Boyan (Ed.), Handbook of research in educational administration (pp.99-122). New York: Longman.
Quinn, R. E. (1984). Applying the competing values approach to leadership: Toward an integrative framework. In J. G. Hunt, D. M. Hosking, C. A. Schriesheim, & R. Stewart (Eds.), Leaders and managers: International perspectives on managerial behavior and leadership(pp. 10-27). New York: Pergamon Press.
Quinn, R. E. (1988). Beyond rational management: Mastering the paradoxes and competing demands of high performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Quinn, R. E. (1996). Deep change: Discovering the leader within. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Quinn, R. E. (2004). Building the bridge as you walk on it: A guide for leading change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Quinn, R. E., & Andersen, D. F. (1984). Formalization as crisis: Transition planning for a young organization. In J. R. Kimberly & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Managing organizational transitions(pp. 11-28). Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
Quinn, R. E., & Cameron, K. S. (1983). Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness: Some preliminary evidence. Management Science, 29(1), 33-51.
Quinn, R. E., & Hall, R. H. (1983). Environments, organizations, and policymakers: Toward an integrative framework. In R. H. Hall & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Organizational theory and public policy (pp.281-298). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Quinn, R. E., & Kimberly, J. R. (1984). Paradox, planning, and perseverance: Guidelines for managerial practice. In J. R. Kimberly & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Managing organizational transitions(pp. 295-313). Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
Quinn, R. E., & McGrath, M. R. (1985). The transformation of organizational cultures: A competing values perspective. In P. J. Frost, L. F. Moore, M. R. Louis, C. C. Lundberg, & J. Martin (Eds.), Organizational culture (pp.315-334). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Quinn, R. E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1981). A competing values approach to organizational effectiveness. Public Productivity Review, 5, 122-140.
Quinn, R. E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science, 29(3), 363-377.
Quinn, R. E., & Spreitzer, G. M. (1991). The psychometrics of the competing values culture instrument and an analysis of the impact of organizational culture on quality of life. In R. W. Woodman & W. A. Pasmore (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development, volume 5 (pp. 115-142). London: JAI Press.
Quinn, R. E., Faerman, S. R., Thompson, M. P., & McGrath, M. R. (1990). Becoming a master manager: A competency framework. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Quinn, R. E., Faerman, S. R., Thompson, M. P., & McGrath, M. R. (1996). Becoming a master manager: A competency framework (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Quinn, R. E., Faerman, S. R., Thompson, M. P., & McGrath, M. R. (2003). Becoming a master manager: A competency framework (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Quinn, R. E., Faerman, S. R., Thompson, M. P., McGrath, M. R., & St. Clair, L. S. (2007). Becoming a master manager: A competing values approach (4th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Quinn, R. E., Spreitzer, G. M., & Hart, S. L. (1992). Integrating the extremes: Crucial skills for managerial effectiveness. In S. Srivastva & R. E. Fry (Eds.), Executive and organizational continuity: Managing the paradoxes of stability and change(pp. 222-252). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Reynolds, D., & Teddlie, C. (2000a). The future agenda for school effectiveness research. In C. Teddlie & D. Reynolds (Eds.), The international handbook of school effectiveness research (pp.322-343). New York: Falmer Press.
Reynolds, D., & Teddlie, C. (2000b). The processes of school effectiveness. In C. Teddlie & D. Reynolds (Eds.), The international handbook of school effectiveness research (pp.134-159). New York: Falmer Press.
Reynolds, D., Teddlie, C., Creemers, B., Scheerens, J., & Townsend, T. (2000). An introduction to school effectiveness research. In C. Teddlie & D. Reynolds (Eds.), The international handbook of school effectiveness research (pp.3-25). New York: Falmer Press.
Rogers, P. S., & Hildebrandt, H. W. (1993). Competing values instruments for analyzing written and spoken management messages. Human Resource Management, 32(1), 121-142.
Rothenberg, A. (1979). The emerging goddess. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1988). Scaling corrections for chi-square statistics in covariance structure analysis. In American Statistical Association 1988 Proceedings of the Business and Economics Section(pp.308-313). Alexandria, VA: American Statistics Association.
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp.399-419). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Scheerens, J. (1992). Effective schooling: Research, theory and practice. London: Cassell.
Scheerens, J., & Bosker, R. J. (1997). The foundations of educational effectiveness. New York: Elsevier Science.
Schein, E. H. (1984). Coming to a new awareness of organizational culture. Sloan Management Review, 25(2), 3-16.
Schein, E. H. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422-445.
Smart, J. C. (2003). Organizational effectiveness of 2-year colleges: The centrality of cultural and leadership complexity. Research in Higher Education, 44(6), 673-703.
Smart, J. C., & Hamm, R. E. (1993). Organizational culture and effectiveness in two-year colleges. Research in Higher Education, 34(1), 95-106.
Smart, J. C., & St. John, E. P. (1996). Organizational culture and effectiveness in higher education: A test of the “culture type” and “strong culture” hypotheses. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18(3), 219-241.
Smart, J. C., Kun, G. D., & Tierney, W. G. (1997). The roles of institutional cultures and decision approaches in promoting organizational effectiveness in two-year colleges. The Journal of Higher Education, 68(3), 256-281.
Sorenson, G. J., & Goethals, G. R. (2004). Leadership theories: Overview. In G. R. Goethals., G. J. Sorenson., & J. M. Burns (Eds.), Encyclopedia of leadership, volume 2 (pp. 867-874). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Teddlie, C., Stringfield, S., & Reynold, D. (2000). Context issues within school effectiveness research. In C. Teddlie & D. Reynolds (Eds.), The international handbook of school effectiveness research (pp.160-185). New York: Falmer Press.
Thakor, A. V. (2000). Becoming a better value creator: How to improve the company’s bottom line— and your own . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Thorpe, G. (2006). Multilevel analysis of PISA 2000 reading results for the United Kingdom using pupil scale variables. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(1), 33-62.
Walton, E. J., & Dawson, S. (2001). Managers’perceptions of criteria of organizational effectiveness. Journal of Management Studies, 38(2), 173-199.
Wexler, M. N. (2005). Leadership in context: The four faces of capitalism. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Williams, R. G., & Deal, T. E. (2003). When opposites dance: Balancing the manager and leader within . Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black.
Witziers, B., Bosker, R. J., & Krüger, M. L. (2003). Educational leadership and student achievement: The elusive search for an association. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 398-425.
Yang, S. C. (2005). Competing values leadership behaviors as a critical indicator of school performance for private kindergartens in Kaohsiung City, Taiwan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Spalding University, Louisville, KY.
Yukl, G. (1981). Leadership in organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Yukl, G. (2006). Leadership in organizations (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Yukl, G., & Lepsinger, R. (2004). Flexible leadership: Creating value by balancing multiple challenge and choice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Zimprich, D., Perren, S., & Hornung, R. (2005). A two-level confirmatory factor analysis of a modified Rosenberg self-esteem scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65(3), 465-481.